Paper · 2025 · Horticultural Plant Journal

Induction of Polyploidy and Physiological Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Apple

ZHAO Yongjuan; JIN Yibo; Yao Yutong; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Polyploid induction technology is one of the most important means used to breed highly resistant varieties. Therefore, this study regenerated isolated leaves of ‘Qin Cui’ using 4.43 g · L -1 of MS + 30 g · L -1 sucrose + 8 g · L -1 agar + 6.0 mg · L -1 thidiazuron (TDZ) + 0.3 mg · L -1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), yielding the highest germination rate of 64.3% and regeneration rate of 147.71%. Further, the study used different concentrations of colchicine and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to screen for the best concentration combination to induce chromosome doubling in ‘Qin Cui’ plants, with a mixture of 0.08% colchicine and 2% DMSO yielding the highest mutagenicity rate of 19.64%. The chromosome doubling effectively improved the salt tolerance of ‘Qin Cui’ plants, as manifested by the more compact leaf tissues, shorter but denser and thicker root systems, stronger root vigour, higher photosynthetic efficiency, and more increased antioxidant enzyme activities in tetraploids than diploids. Polyploidy also maintained Na + /K + homeostasis and regulated amino acid metabolism in ‘Qin Cui’ plants, which are also important pathways in enhancing salt tolerance in tetraploids. Therefore, chromosome doubling enhanced the salt tolerance in ‘Qin Cui’ plants by regulating phenotypic changes and stomatal opening, alleviating chlorophyll degradation to prevent photosynthetic impairment, increasing antioxidant enzyme activities, mitigating ion toxicity and regulating amino acid metabolism. The findings of this study could also provide new germplasm resources for apple quality improvement, as well as a theoretical basis for the regulation of apple polyploid resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified regeneration medium yielded a germination rate of 64.3%.

Treatment
4.43 g · L -1 of MS + 30 g · L -1 sucrose + 8 g · L -1 agar + 6.0 mg · L -1 thidiazuron (TDZ) + 0.3 mg · L -1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
64.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 4.43 g · L -1 of MS + 30 g · L -1 sucrose + 8 g · L -1 agar + 6.0 mg · L -1 thidiazuron (TDZ) + 0.3 mg · L -1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), yielding the highest germination rate of 64.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Thidiazuron · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

agar · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.