Paper · 2003 · Acta Horticulturae

MICROPROPAGATION OF THE APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26 BY TEMPORARY IMMERSION SYSTEM (TIS)

I.H. Zhu; X.Y. Li; M. Welander

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to develop an efficient and economic micropropagation technique for fruit trees and ornamental plants, a liquid culturing system in the RITA containers using temporary immersion principle was examined on the apple rootstock M26. Several plant growth regulators were tested in the multiplication and elongation phase on two different types of explants. The results showed that the multiplication rate increased with an increase in the concentration of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium, but the shoot length decreased at the same time. Hyperhydricity increased with a rise in concentration of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium. Stem explants produced more shoots than shoot tips. The rooting results showed that shoots from all treatments rooted more than 90%. The higher concentrations of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium did not affect the rooting percentage, root number and root length, nor did the addition of kinetin in the elongation medium. The plantlets were easily acclimatized in the greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher BAP and IBA concentrations increased multiplication rate.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
increase in the concentration of BAP and IBAe0
Outcome
multiplication ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“the multiplication rate increased with an increase in the concentration of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher BAP and IBA concentrations decreased shoot length.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
increase in the concentration of BAP and IBAe1
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot length decreased at the same time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in the concentration of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher BAP and IBA concentrations increased hyperhydricity.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
rise in concentration of BAP and IBAe0
Outcome
Hyperhydricitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hyperhydricity increased with a rise in concentration of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem explants produced more shoots than shoot tips.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
Stem explantse0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
shoot tipse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stem explants produced more shoots than shoot tips.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots from all treatments rooted at more than 90%.

Material
M26t0
Outcome
rootede0
Direction
more thane0
Value
more than 90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“shoots from all treatments rooted more than 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher BAP and IBA concentrations did not affect rooting percentage, root number, or root length.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
higher concentrations of BAP and IBAe0
Outcome
rooting percentage, root number and root lengthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher concentrations of BAP and IBA in the multiplication medium did not affect the rooting percentage, root number and root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin in the elongation medium did not affect rooting percentage, root number, or root length.

Material
M26t0
Treatment
addition of kinetin in the elongation mediume0
Outcome
rooting percentage, root number and root lengthe0
Direction
nore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“rooting percentage, root number and root length, nor did the addition of kinetin in the elongation medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–977 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets acclimatized easily in the greenhouse.

Material
M26t0
Outcome
easily acclimatizede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCK M26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plantlets were easily acclimatized in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1036 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

kinetin · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

N-benzyladenine · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.