Paper · 1997 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Chemical Weed Control In Linseed (Linum Usitatissimum L.)

K. S. Sandhu; R. K. Bhatia; S. K. Randhawa; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted for three years from 1990–91 to 1992–23 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana to find out the chemical weed control schedule for linseed. Isoproturon (0.75 and 0.94 kg/ha) pre-emergence and post-emergence (before and after first irrigation) and 2, 4-D sodium salt (0.5 and 0.75 kg/ha) were tried. Postemergence application before irrigation was more safe as compared to application after irrigation. Isoproturon degraded to non-detectable level in the plants by 90 days. Isoproturon pre- or post-emergence provided effective control and yielded significantly higher than unweeded control. 2, 4-D alone or in combination with isoproturon was phytotoxic and yielded lower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence application before irrigation was safer than after irrigation.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
Postemergence application before irrigatione0
Outcome
safee0
Direction
more safee0
Comparator
application after irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Postemergence application before irrigation was more safe as compared to application after irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon residues in plants declined to non-detectable levels by 90 days.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Outcome
Isoproturon degradede0
Direction
non-detectablee0
Qualifier
by 90 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon degraded to non-detectable level in the plants by 90 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre- or post-emergence isoproturon effectively controlled weeds.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
Isoproturon pre- or post-emergencee0
Outcome
effective controle0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon pre- or post-emergence provided effective control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre- or post-emergence isoproturon gave significantly higher linseed yield than the unweeded control.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
Isoproturon pre- or post-emergencee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon pre- or post-emergence provided effective control and yielded significantly higher than unweeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D alone or combined with isoproturon was phytotoxic to linseed.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
2, 4-D alone or in combination with isoproturone0
Outcome
phytotoxice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D alone or in combination with isoproturon was phytotoxic and yielded lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D alone or combined with isoproturon reduced linseed yield.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
2, 4-D alone or in combination with isoproturone0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D alone or in combination with isoproturon was phytotoxic and yielded lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · crop injury · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

isoproturon · crop injury · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · control · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.