Paper · 1983 · Weed Science

Herbicide Mixtures Containing BAS 9052 for Weed Control in Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

Paul N.P. Chow

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There was no antagonism between dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) or TCA (trichloroacetic acid) and BAS 9052 {2 - [1 -(ethoxyimino)butyl] - 5 - [2 -(ethylthio) -propyl] -3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} at 0.3 kg/ha for control of volunteer barley ( Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Bonanza’) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’) in flax ( Linum usitatissimum L. ‘Dufferin’). However, MCPA {[(4-chloro- o - tolyl)oxy] acetic acid} amine at 0.2 to 0.6 kg/ha had an antagonistic effect on BAS 9052, especially at 0.1 kg/ha, for control of wild oat ( Avena fatua L.). BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha overcame this antagonistic effect of MCPA. Field results confirmed that wild oat control with BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha was not reduced by the mixtures with each of four broadleaf weed herbicides at 0.6 kg/ha. The mixtures gave excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds. Flax seed yields were five times that of the unsprayed check and were equal to the yield of the handweeded treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dalapon or TCA mixed with BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha showed no antagonism in controlling volunteer barley and wheat in flax.

Treatment
dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) or TCA (trichloroacetic acid) and BAS 9052e0
Interactor
volunteer barleye5weed
Second interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume6weed
Compound
BAS 9052e0
Outcome
control of volunteer barleye5
Direction
no antagonisme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no antagonism between dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) or TCA (trichloroacetic acid) and BAS 9052”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e5

“for control of volunteer barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–247 · show in text ↑
e6

“and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCPA amine at 0.2 to 0.6 kg/ha had an antagonistic effect on BAS 9052 in wild oat control, especially at 0.1 kg/ha.

Treatment
amine at 0.2 to 0.6 kg/hae2
Interactor
wild oate3weed
Compound
MCPAe2
Outcome
control of wild oate3
Direction
antagonistic effecte2
Qualifier
especially at 0.1 kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“MCPA {[(4-chloro- o - tolyl)oxy] acetic acid} amine at 0.2 to 0.6 kg/ha had an antagonistic effect on BAS 9052”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“especially at 0.1 kg/ha, for control of wild oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha overcame the antagonistic effect of MCPA.

Treatment
BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/hae3
Compound
BAS 9052e3
Outcome
antagonistic effecte3
Direction
overcamee3
Comparator
MCPAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha overcame this antagonistic effect of MCPA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild oat control with BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha was not reduced by mixtures with four broadleaf herbicides at 0.6 kg/ha.

Treatment
mixtures with each of four broadleaf weed herbicides at 0.6 kg/hae4
Interactor
wild oate4weed
Compound
BAS 9052e4
Outcome
wild oat controle4
Direction
not reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“Field results confirmed that wild oat control with BAS 9052 at 0.3 kg/ha was not reduced by the mixtures with each of four broadleaf weed herbicides at 0.6 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixtures gave excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds in flax.

Interactor
grass and broadleaf weedse5weed
Outcome
control of grass and broadleaf weedse5
Qualifier
excellente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“The mixtures gave excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax seed yields were five times that of the unsprayed check.

Outcome
Flax seed yieldse6
Value
five timese6
Qualifier
that of the unsprayed checke6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Flax seed yields were five times that of the unsprayed check and were equal to the yield of the handweeded treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–969 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax yield under the herbicide treatments was equal to that of the handweeded treatment.

Outcome
yielde6
Direction
equale6
Comparator
handweeded treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax (Linum usitatissimum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Flax seed yields were five times that of the unsprayed check and were equal to the yield of the handweeded treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–969 · show in text ↑

herbicide · control · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.