Abstract
Summary: Five field experiments were conducted from 1972 to 1975 to evaluate weed control in flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) using post‐emergence treatments of asulam [methyl (4‐aminobenzenesulphonyl) carbamatel alone and in combination with other herbicides. The 14 C‐asulam absorption by leaf segments and roots of glasshouse grown wild oats (Avena fatua L.) was also investigated. Asulam at 1.12 kg/ha gave good wild oat control and acceptable control of green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.). However, wild oat control was poorer when asulam was combined with other herbicides: on a 3‐year average, as compared with asulam alone at equal rates, the asulam+MCPA mixture resulted in a greater antagonism and a significant 6% reduction in flax seed yield, whereas the asulam+bromoxynil/MCPA mixture gave the least antagonistic effect, improved broadleaf weed control and increased yield by 13%. In mixtures, the potassium salt of MCPA was more compatible with asulam for weed control than the amine form. Both leaf segments and roots of wild oats absorbed and distributed less 14 C‐asulam from solutions containing MCPA than from those containing bromoxynil or bromoxynil/MCPA.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam controlled wild oats well.
- Taxon
- flax
Linum usitatissimumt0 - Treatment
- Asulam at 1.12 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- wild oate0weed
- Outcome
- wild oat controle0
- Direction
- goode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Asulam at 1.12 kg/ha gave good wild oat control”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam gave acceptable green foxtail control.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- Asulam at 1.12 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- green foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- control of green foxtaile0
- Direction
- acceptablee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Asulam at 1.12 kg/ha gave good wild oat control and acceptable control of green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.)”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam combinations gave poorer wild oat control than asulam alone.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- asulam was combined with other herbicidese0
- Interactor
- wild oate0weed
- Outcome
- wild oat controle0
- Direction
- poorere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wild oat control was poorer when asulam was combined with other herbicides”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam plus MCPA reduced flax seed yield by 6% relative to asulam alone.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimume0
- Treatment
- asulam+MCPA mixturee0
- Outcome
- flax seed yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the asulam+MCPA mixture resulted in a greater antagonism and a significant 6% reduction in flax seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam plus bromoxynil/MCPA increased flax yield by 13%.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- asulam+bromoxynil/MCPA mixturee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the asulam+bromoxynil/MCPA mixture gave the least antagonistic effect, improved broadleaf weed control and increased yield by 13%”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Asulam plus bromoxynil/MCPA improved broadleaf weed control.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- asulam+bromoxynil/MCPA mixturee0
- Interactor
- broadleaf weede0weed
- Outcome
- broadleaf weed controle0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the asulam+bromoxynil/MCPA mixture gave the least antagonistic effect, improved broadleaf weed control”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium MCPA was more compatible with asulam than amine MCPA.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Outcome
- compatible with asulam for weed controle0
- Direction
- more compatiblee0
- Comparator
- the amine forme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the potassium salt of MCPA was more compatible with asulam for weed control than the amine form”
t0“flax”
Claim · model-written summary
Wild oat leaves and roots absorbed and distributed less radiolabeled asulam from MCPA solutions.
- Taxon
- flaxLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- solutions containing MCPAe0
- Outcome
- wild oats absorbed and distributed less 14 C‐asulame0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- those containing bromoxynil or bromoxynil/MCPAe0
AvenaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both leaf segments and roots of wild oats absorbed and distributed less 14 C‐asulam from solutions containing MCPA than from those containing bromoxynil or bromoxynil/MCPA.”
t0“flax”
The same questions in other papers
(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · weed · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
herbicide · control · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.