Paper · 1996 · RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)

Somatic embryogenesis, organogenesis and callus growth kinetics of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Ana Cunha; Manuel Fernandes‐Ferreira

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The effects of plant growth regulators (PGR) on calli induction, morphogenesis and somatic embryogenesis of flax were studied. The organogenic and callus formation capacity were assessed for different types of source explants. Root and shoot explants were equally good material for calli production but the former produced calli without shoot regeneration capacity. Under the experimental conditions tested, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + zeatin (ZEA) was the most efficient PGR combination on calli induction and biomass production. The calli were green but with no rhizogenic capacity. On the contrary, and at similar concentrations, indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) + kinetin (KIN) induced white or pale green friable calli with a good root regeneration capacity (60%). A factorial experiment with different combinations of 2,4-D + ZEA + gibberellic acid (GA3) levels revealed that the direction of explant differentiation was determined by specific PGR interactions and concentrations. The results from these experiments revealed that the morphogenetic pathway (shoot versus root differentiation) can be manipulated on flax explants by raising the 2,4-D level from 0.05 to 3.2 mg l-1 in the induction medium. The induction and development of somatic embryos from flax explants was possible in a range of 2,4-D+ZEA concentrations surrounding 0.4 mg l-1 2,4-D and 1.6 mg l-1 ZEA, the most efficient phytohormonal combination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot explants were equally good for callus production.

Organ / stage
Root and shoot explantse0
Outcome
equally good material for calli productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root and shoot explants were equally good material for calli production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root explant calli lacked shoot regeneration capacity.

Organ / stage
callie0
Outcome
without shoot regeneration capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“the former produced calli without shoot regeneration capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D plus ZEA was the most efficient combination for callus induction and biomass.

Treatment
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + zeatin (ZEA)e0
Outcome
calli induction and biomass productione0
Direction
most efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) + zeatin (ZEA) was the most efficient PGR combination on calli induction and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–542 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calli under 2,4-D and ZEA were green and lacked root regeneration capacity.

Outcome
green but with no rhizogenic capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The calli were green but with no rhizogenic capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA plus KIN induced friable calli with 60% root regeneration capacity.

Treatment
indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) + kinetin (KIN)e0
Outcome
root regeneration capacitye0
Direction
goode0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) + kinetin (KIN) induced white or pale green friable calli with a good root regeneration capacity (60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–776 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR interactions and concentrations determined explant differentiation direction.

Treatment
specific PGR interactions and concentrationse0
Outcome
direction of explant differentiatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“the direction of explant differentiation was determined by specific PGR interactions and concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising 2,4-D from 0.05 to 3.2 mg l-1 could change shoot versus root differentiation.

Treatment
raising the 2,4-D level from 0.05 to 3.2 mg l-1e0
Outcome
morphogenetic pathway (shoot versus root differentiation)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the morphogenetic pathway (shoot versus root differentiation) can be manipulated on flax explants by raising the 2,4-D level from 0.05 to 3.2 mg l-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Somatic embryo induction was most efficient around 0.4 mg l-1 2,4-D and 1.6 mg l-1 ZEA.

Treatment
2,4-D+ZEA concentrations surrounding 0.4 mg l-1 2,4-D and 1.6 mg l-1 ZEAe0
Outcome
induction and development of somatic embryose0
Direction
most efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The induction and development of somatic embryos from flax explants was possible in a range of 2,4-D+ZEA concentrations surrounding 0.4 mg l-1 2,4-D and 1.6 mg l-1 ZEA, the most efficient phytohormonal combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1432 · show in text ↑

zeatin · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

kinetin · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.