Paper · 2015 · Annals of Agricultural Research

Effect of sodic water, biofertilizer and phosphorus on physical properties of soil, yield attributes and yield of mungbean

Subhita Kumari; B. L. Yadav; Hanuman Prasad Verma; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to asses the effect of phosphorus management and biofertilizer in mungbean irrigated with sodic water during 2013. Three levels each of sodic water (control, 3.0 and 6.0 mmol/L), biofertilizer (control, PSB and PSB + VAM) and phosphorus (control, 15 and 30 mg/ kg of soil), were tested in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The results indicated that application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity, total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments. A application of irrigation water having RSC 6.0 mmol/L recorded significantly higher pH, EC and ESP as compared to other treatments. However, pH, EC and ESP did not show any significantly difference under different levels of phosphorus and biofertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined irrigation water, biofertilizer and phosphorus treatment maximized soil phosphorus.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soile0
Outcome
total and available phosphoruse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity, total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximized soil enzyme activities.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soile1
Outcome
dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activitye0
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity, total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximized nodulation.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soile1
Outcome
total and effective nodules, nodule indexe0
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total and effective nodules, nodule index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity, total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximized pods per plant and grain yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soile1
Outcome
number of pods per plant, grain yielde0
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods per plant, grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, alkaline phosphate activity, total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximized straw and biological yields.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soile2
Outcome
straw yield and biological yielde0
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield and biological yield of mungbean over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–814 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of irrigation water having RSC 1.0 mmol/L, biofertilizer viz. PSB + VAM and phosphorus 30 mg/kg of soil recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RSC 6.0 mmol/L irrigation raised soil pH, EC and ESP.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation water having RSC 6.0 mmol/Le0
Outcome
pH, EC and ESPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation water having RSC 6.0 mmol/L recorded significantly higher pH, EC and ESP as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and biofertilizer levels did not significantly differ for pH, EC and ESP.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
different levels of phosphorus and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
pH, EC and ESPe0
Direction
did not show any significantly differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH, EC and ESP did not show any significantly difference under different levels of phosphorus and biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–122 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

phosphorus · soil: biology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.