Paper · 2014 · Journal of Entomological Research

Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop

S. Chakraborti; P. K. Sarkar; Arunabha Chakraborty

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The approach using components like yellow sticky trap, repellent crop (coriander), plant sanitation, periodic removal of YVMV infected plants and plant fractions (leaf extract of rose apple and neem oil) worked well by effectively arresting the disease development and vector population build up. Besides one application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad, was sufficient to produce a conclusive effect on the vector and YVMV disease development and resulted in good yields. Only 2.5 -2.9% YVMV infected plants and 0.8 -1.1 white fly/leaf were recorded on 30 days after sowing. Thereafter, both the vector and the virus were wiped away from the plants under these treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The management approach with yellow sticky traps, coriander repellent crop and plant sanitation effectively arrested okra yellow vein mosaic virus disease development.

Treatment
yellow sticky trap, repellent crop (coriander), plant sanitatione0
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virusOkra yellow vein mosaic virust0pathogen
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
arrestinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e0

“The approach using components like yellow sticky trap, repellent crop (coriander), plant sanitation, periodic removal of YVMV infected plants and plant fractions (leaf extract of rose apple and neem oil) worked well by effectively arresting the disease development and vector population build up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The management approach with yellow sticky traps, coriander repellent crop and plant sanitation effectively arrested the build-up of the whitefly vector population in okra.

Treatment
yellow sticky trap, repellent crop (coriander), plant sanitatione0
Interactor
white flyt0pest
Outcome
vector population build upe0
Direction
arrestinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e0

“The approach using components like yellow sticky trap, repellent crop (coriander), plant sanitation, periodic removal of YVMV infected plants and plant fractions (leaf extract of rose apple and neem oil) worked well by effectively arresting the disease development and vector population build up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad had a conclusive effect on the whitefly vector in okra.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate and spinosade1
Interactor
white flyt0pest
Outcome
vectore1
Qualifier
conclusive effecte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“one application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad, was sufficient to produce a conclusive effect on the vector and YVMV disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad had a conclusive effect on okra yellow vein mosaic virus disease development.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate and spinosade1
Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virusOkra yellow vein mosaic virust0pathogen
Outcome
YVMV disease developmente1
Qualifier
conclusive effecte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“one application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad, was sufficient to produce a conclusive effect on the vector and YVMV disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad resulted in good okra yields.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate and spinosade1
Outcome
yieldse2
Qualifier
goode2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“one application each of emamectin benzoate and spinosad, was sufficient to produce a conclusive effect on the vector and YVMV disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–450 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in good yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–478 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra yellow vein mosaic virus infected plants were 2.5 to 2.9% at 30 days after sowing under these treatments.

Interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virusOkra yellow vein mosaic virust0pathogen
Outcome
YVMV infected plantse3
Value
2.5 -2.9%e3
Qualifier
30 days after sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e3

“Only 2.5 -2.9% YVMV infected plants and 0.8 -1.1 white fly/leaf were recorded on 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly density was 0.8 to 1.1 per leaf at 30 days after sowing under these treatments.

Interactor
white flyt0pest
Outcome
white fly/leafe3
Value
0.8 -1.1e3
Qualifier
30 days after sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e3

“Only 2.5 -2.9% YVMV infected plants and 0.8 -1.1 white fly/leaf were recorded on 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under these treatments both the whitefly vector and the virus were wiped away from okra plants.

Interactor
white flyt0pest
Second interactor
okra yellow vein mosaic virusOkra yellow vein mosaic virust0pathogen
Outcome
the vector and the viruse4
Qualifier
wiped awaye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessing the impacts of safer management strategies for okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its white fly vector with emphasis on under-storey repellent crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thereafter, both the vector and the virus were wiped away from the plants under these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–679 · show in text ↑

Coriandrum sativum · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.