Paper · 2012 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Management of Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Monech

Jamshaid Iqbal; Muhammad Sagheer; Mansoor-ul-Hasan; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Various control practices, viz., host plant resistance, release of Chrysoperla spp., seed-treatment with imidacloprid, use of yellow sticky trap, neem seed kernel extract, spray of imidacloprid were applied singly, and in their possible combinations, at three localities, on a comparatively jassid resistant genotype of okra, Punjab Selection for the control of jassid. The treatment effect, alone, and in their possible combinations, showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness. A combination of treatments, viz., seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky traps, was found the most effective and resulted in a minimum population of jassid, per leaf, on okra; whereas, the effect of seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population. A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments. The seeds treated with imidacloprid, remained effective against the jassids up to 38 days, after sowing. The combination of seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky traps, showed a maximum yield of okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control treatments differed significantly in effectiveness against jassid on okra.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
significant differencee0
Comparator
one anothere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment effect, alone, and in their possible combinations, showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment, imidacloprid spray and yellow sticky traps together produced the lowest jassid population per okra leaf.

Treatment
seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky trapse0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
population of jassid, per leafe0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky traps, was found the most effective and resulted in a minimum population of jassid, per leaf, on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment alone had no distinctive effect on jassid population.

Treatment
seed-treatmente0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
did not show distinctive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow sticky traps alone had no distinctive effect on jassid population.

Treatment
installation of yellow sticky trapse0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
did not show distinctive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid spray alone significantly decreased jassid population.

Treatment
imidacloprid was sprayede0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid-populatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid spray combined with other treatments significantly decreased jassid population.

Treatment
imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatmentse0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid-populatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid seed treatment remained effective against jassids for up to 38 days after sowing.

Treatment
treated with imidaclopride0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
effective against the jassidse0
Value
38 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds treated with imidacloprid, remained effective against the jassids up to 38 days, after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment plus imidacloprid spray plus sticky traps gave maximum okra yield.

Treatment
seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky trapse0
Outcome
yield of okrae0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky traps, showed a maximum yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1259 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

seed treatment · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.