Abstract
Various control practices, viz., host plant resistance, release of Chrysoperla spp., seed-treatment with imidacloprid, use of yellow sticky trap, neem seed kernel extract, spray of imidacloprid were applied singly, and in their possible combinations, at three localities, on a comparatively jassid resistant genotype of okra, Punjab Selection for the control of jassid. The treatment effect, alone, and in their possible combinations, showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness. A combination of treatments, viz., seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky traps, was found the most effective and resulted in a minimum population of jassid, per leaf, on okra; whereas, the effect of seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population. A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments. The seeds treated with imidacloprid, remained effective against the jassids up to 38 days, after sowing. The combination of seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky traps, showed a maximum yield of okra.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Control treatments differed significantly in effectiveness against jassid on okra.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- treatmente0
- Outcome
- effectivenesse0
- Direction
- significant differencee0
- Comparator
- one anothere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The treatment effect, alone, and in their possible combinations, showed a significant difference with one another, regarding their effectiveness”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment, imidacloprid spray and yellow sticky traps together produced the lowest jassid population per okra leaf.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky trapse0
- Interactor
- jasside0pest
- Outcome
- population of jassid, per leafe0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment, spray with imidacloprid and installation of yellow sticky traps, was found the most effective and resulted in a minimum population of jassid, per leaf, on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment alone had no distinctive effect on jassid population.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- seed-treatmente0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populatione0
- Direction
- did not show distinctive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population”
t0“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Yellow sticky traps alone had no distinctive effect on jassid population.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- installation of yellow sticky trapse0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populatione0
- Direction
- did not show distinctive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed-treatment and installation of yellow sticky traps, alone, did not show distinctive effect on the pest population”
t0“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid spray alone significantly decreased jassid population.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid was sprayede0
- Interactor
- jasside0pest
- Outcome
- jassid-populatione0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid spray combined with other treatments significantly decreased jassid population.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatmentse0
- Interactor
- jasside0pest
- Outcome
- jassid-populatione0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A significant decrease in the jassid-population was observed in those plots, where imidacloprid was sprayed, alone, or in combination with other treatments”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid seed treatment remained effective against jassids for up to 38 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- treated with imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- effective against the jassidse0
- Value
- 38 dayse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The seeds treated with imidacloprid, remained effective against the jassids up to 38 days, after sowing”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment plus imidacloprid spray plus sticky traps gave maximum okra yield.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky trapse0
- Outcome
- yield of okrae0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed-treatment + spray of imidacloprid + installation of yellow sticky traps, showed a maximum yield of okra”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →seed treatment · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
trap barrier · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →trap barrier · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.