Paper · 2017 · Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS LIGHT ON PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS IN SOLONACEA SPECIES

Татьяна Геннадиевна Шибаева; Александр Федорович Титов; Tatyana Shibaeva; et al.

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic activity of three Solanacea species – Solanum lycopersicum L., Solanum melongena L. and Capsicum annuum L. in response to continuous lighting (CL) during pre-reproductive period were studied. It is shown that CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant. These changes were aimed to reduce light absorption efficiency per unit leaf area. CL-induced leaf injuries were seen as interveinal chlorosis in tomato and necrotic spots in eggplant. Sweet pepper plants did not show a reduction in chlorophyll content. On the contrary, some increase in chlorophyll content was observed, although pepper leaves had some deformations (wrinkles). A higher concentration of carotenoids possessing photoprotective properties in pepper leaves probably protects the photosynthetic apparatus of this species from adverse excessive lighting. Possible reasons of CL-induced leaf injuries are discussed, among them are the continuous energy supply for photosynthesis, continuous photooxidative stress, continuous signalling to the photoreceptors and a mismatch between the internal circadian clock frequency and the external light/dark cycle known as circadian asynchrony. We suppose that another possible cause of leaf depigmentation under unfavorable light conditions may be of genetic nature. Some species (ecotypes, genotypes) may have a photosensitive mutant gene, which is normally suppressed and does not manifest itself, wherefore mutant plants phenotypically do not differ from normal (wild type) plants. In such plants, excessive lighting may cause inactivation of the suppressor protein controlledby suppressor gene and, consequently, de-repression of the mutant gene, resulting in leaf depigmentation. In this case, CL-induced chlorosis and possibly necrosis in CL-sensitive plant species (ecotypes, genotypes) can be considered as a manifestation of suppressed light-dependent chlorophyll deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light decreased tomato chlorophyll content and light-harvesting complex II while increasing chlorophyll a/b ratio.

Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light increased the tomato chlorophyll a/b ratio.

Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato.

Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
light-harvesting complex IIe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light decreased eggplant chlorophyll content.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light increased eggplant chlorophyll a/b ratio.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light reduced light-harvesting complex II in eggplant.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
light-harvesting complex IIe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light induced interveinal chlorosis in tomato.

Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
interveinal chlorosise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL-induced leaf injuries were seen as interveinal chlorosis in tomato and necrotic spots in eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light induced necrotic spots in eggplant.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
CLe0
Outcome
necrotic spotse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CL-induced leaf injuries were seen as interveinal chlorosis in tomato and necrotic spots in eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet pepper chlorophyll content did not fall under continuous light.

Taxon
Sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
CLe1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
did not show a reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet pepper plants did not show a reduction in chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“CONTINUOUS LIGHT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper chlorophyll content increased somewhat.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
CLe1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
somee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“some increase in chlorophyll content was observed, although pepper leaves had some deformations (wrinkles)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“CONTINUOUS LIGHT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper leaves developed wrinkles.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
CLe1
Outcome
deformations (wrinkles)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“pepper leaves had some deformations (wrinkles)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“CONTINUOUS LIGHT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“CL resulted in decreased chlorophyll content, increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, reduced light-harvesting complex II in tomato and eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper leaves had a higher carotenoid concentration.

Taxon
peppere0
Outcome
concentration of carotenoidse0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“A higher concentration of carotenoids possessing photoprotective properties in pepper leaves probably protects the photosynthetic apparatus of this species from adverse excessive lighting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–958 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors proposed that higher carotenoids may protect pepper photosynthesis under excess light.

Taxon
peppere0
Compound
carotenoidse0
Outcome
protects the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Qualifier
probablye0

Verbatim

e0

“A higher concentration of carotenoids possessing photoprotective properties in pepper leaves probably protects the photosynthetic apparatus of this species from adverse excessive lighting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–958 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors hypothesized that suppressor inactivation under excess light could derepress a mutant gene and cause leaf depigmentation.

Taxon
SOLONACEA SPECIESt0
Gene
mutant genee0
Outcome
leaf depigmentatione0
Qualifier
may cause inactivation of the suppressor proteine0

Verbatim

e0

“excessive lighting may cause inactivation of the suppressor protein controlledby suppressor gene and, consequently, de-repression of the mutant gene, resulting in leaf depigmentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1828 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOLONACEA SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.