Paper · 2009 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

Effect of short-term exposure to two different carbon dioxide concentrations on growth and some biochemical parameters of edible beans (Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculata).

Neelofer Hamid; Faiza Jawaid; Deenaz Amin

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two weeks old seedling of Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculata were exposed to 2% and 3% CO2 for 5 and 10 minutes in controlled environment chamber thrice a week for 4 weeks. The treatment had definite positive effect on Specific leaf area, total carbohydrate and total chlorophyll content promoted to increasing concentrations and duration of carbon dioxide exposure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 exposure increased specific leaf area with concentration and duration.

Taxon
Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
carbon dioxide exposuree0
Outcome
Specific leaf areae0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment had definite positive effect on Specific leaf area, total carbohydrate and total chlorophyll content promoted to increasing concentrations and duration of carbon dioxide exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 exposure increased total carbohydrate and chlorophyll with concentration and duration.

Taxon
Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
carbon dioxide exposuree0
Outcome
total carbohydrate and total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment had definite positive effect on Specific leaf area, total carbohydrate and total chlorophyll content promoted to increasing concentrations and duration of carbon dioxide exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vigna radiata and Vigna unguiculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

co2 · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.