Paper · 2022 · Journal of Agrometeorology

Impact of climate change (elevated CO2 and temperature) on growth and development of cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

MEGHA; A. G. Sreenivas; N. SUSHILA; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Climate change has a widespread influence on agricultural productivity and relies upon the fact that responses vary between crops. Any changes in the nutritional quality of the host plant will have direct influences on associated insect pests and the damage that it causes. In this context, a study was conducted to measure the impact of elevated CO2 and temperature on the growth and development of cowpea (C3 plant) and its herbivore pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) under open top chambers at the Center for Agro-climatic Studies, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka. Elevated CO2 had a positive impact on cowpea growth by encouraging crop boom along with vital changes in its phytochemistry. The increased supply of CO2 resulted in higher concentrations of ‘C’ and C-based metabolites and chlorophyll (39.81 µg/cm2) and nitrogen balance index (104.52). However, ‘N’ and N-based compounds were reduced. Larvae fed upon such nutrient-deficient food increased their development period (36.07 ±0.42days) and compensatory feeding inflicting more damage (7.72 webbings/plant). Although the larvae consumed more food, it decreased the body weight of the larvae and pupae, which in turn decreased the percent moth emergence, ultimately decreasing the fecundity (60.09 ± 0.20/female) and fitness of the pest in the long run.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 promoted cowpea growth.

Treatment
Elevated CO2e0
Outcome
cowpea growthe0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO2 had a positive impact on cowpea growth by encouraging crop boom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased carbon and carbon-based metabolites in cowpea.

Treatment
increased supply of CO2e0
Outcome
concentrations of ‘C’ and C-based metabolitese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased supply of CO2 resulted in higher concentrations of ‘C’ and C-based metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised cowpea chlorophyll to 39.81 µg/cm2.

Treatment
increased supply of CO2e0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
39.81 µg/cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased supply of CO2 resulted in higher concentrations of ‘C’ and C-based metabolites and chlorophyll (39.81 µg/cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised the nitrogen balance index to 104.52.

Treatment
elevated CO2t0
Outcome
nitrogen balance indexe0
Value
104.52e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and nitrogen balance index (104.52). However, ‘N’ and N-based compounds were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“elevated CO2 and temperature) on growth and development of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and nitrogen-based compounds declined under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO2t0
Outcome
‘N’ and N-based compoundse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, ‘N’ and N-based compounds were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“elevated CO2 and temperature) on growth and development of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larvae feeding on nutrient-deficient cowpea had longer development, 36.07 ±0.42days.

Treatment
nutrient-deficient foode0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
development periode0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.07 ±0.42dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larvae fed upon such nutrient-deficient food increased their development period (36.07 ±0.42days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval compensatory feeding increased damage to 7.72 webbings per plant.

Treatment
compensatory feedinge0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
moree0
Value
7.72 webbings/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and compensatory feeding inflicting more damage (7.72 webbings/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite greater food consumption, larval body weight decreased.

Treatment
consumed more foode0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
body weight of the larvaee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the larvae consumed more food, it decreased the body weight of the larvae and pupae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite greater food consumption, pupal body weight decreased.

Treatment
consumed more foode0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
body weight of the larvae and pupaee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the larvae consumed more food, it decreased the body weight of the larvae and pupae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth emergence percentage decreased.

Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
percent moth emergencee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which in turn decreased the percent moth emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest fecundity decreased to 60.09 ± 0.20 per female.

Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
fecunditye0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
60.09 ± 0.20/femalee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ultimately decreasing the fecundity (60.09 ± 0.20/female) and fitness of the pest in the long run”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest fitness decreased in the long run.

Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
Outcome
fitness of the peste0
Direction
decreasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ultimately decreasing the fecundity (60.09 ± 0.20/female) and fitness of the pest in the long run”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.