Paper · 2022 · Plant Methods

Cowpea speed breeding using regulated growth chamber conditions and seeds of oven-dried immature pods potentially accommodates eight generations per year

Offiong Ukpong Edet; Takayoshi Ishii

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Cowpea is a dryland crop with potential to improve food security in sub-Saharan Africa, where it is mostly produced and consumed. Contemporary plant improvement technologies, including genome editing, marker-assisted selection, and optimized transformation protocols, are being deployed to improve cowpea characteristics. Integrating speed breeding with these technologies would accelerate genetic gain in cowpea breeding. There are established speed breeding protocols for other important legumes, such as soybean, peanut, and chickpea, but none has been previously reported for cowpea. Results With the aid of regulated growth conditions in two different chamber types, as well as the cultivation of new plant generations from seeds of oven-dried immature pods, we developed and validated, for the first time, an efficient speed breeding protocol that accommodates approximately seven to eight breeding generations per year for 3 cowpea genotypes. The 3 cowpea genotypes were evaluated under controlled growth conditions in light-emitting diode and metal halide lamp chambers to determine the effect of CO 2 supplementation on flowering and maturation durations, optimum conditions for plant growth, cross pollination, and pod development. Elevated CO 2 concentration had no influence on either flowering time or pod development. Adequate temperature, relative humidity and light intensity improved plant development and the rate of successful hand pollination, and cultivating seeds of 11-day-old immature pods oven-dried at 39 °C for 2 days resulted in at least a 62% reduction in the time between pollination and sowing of the next plant generation. The plants cultivated from seeds of the oven-dried immature pods showed no defect at any stage of development. Conclusions Using the speed breeding protocol developed in this study, cowpea breeding cycles can be increased from the traditional one cycle per year in the field to as many as 8 generations per year in regulated growth chamber conditions. This protocol has no special technical requirements; hence, it can be implemented in any standard growth chamber. This would fast-track development, testing, validation, and utilization of improved cowpea cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The speed-breeding protocol accommodates approximately seven to eight cowpea generations per year.

Outcome
breeding generations per yeare0
Value
approximately seven to eight breeding generations per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient speed breeding protocol that accommodates approximately seven to eight breeding generations per year for 3 cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no influence on cowpea flowering time.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 concentration had no influence on either flowering time or pod development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no influence on cowpea pod development.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
pod developmente0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 concentration had no influence on either flowering time or pod development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate temperature, humidity, and light improved cowpea plant development.

Treatment
Adequate temperature, relative humidity and light intensitye0
Outcome
plant developmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adequate temperature, relative humidity and light intensity improved plant development and the rate of successful hand pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate temperature, humidity, and light improved successful hand pollination in cowpea.

Treatment
Adequate temperature, relative humidity and light intensitye0
Outcome
rate of successful hand pollinatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adequate temperature, relative humidity and light intensity improved plant development and the rate of successful hand pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from oven-dried immature cowpea pods reduced the interval from pollination to the next sowing by at least 62%.

Treatment
cultivating seeds of 11-day-old immature pods oven-dried at 39 °C for 2 dayse0
Outcome
time between pollination and sowing of the next plant generatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
at least a 62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivating seeds of 11-day-old immature pods oven-dried at 39 °C for 2 days resulted in at least a 62% reduction in the time between pollination and sowing of the next plant generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown from oven-dried immature cowpea pod seeds showed no developmental defects.

Treatment
seeds of the oven-dried immature podse0
Outcome
no defect at any stage of developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants cultivated from seeds of the oven-dried immature pods showed no defect at any stage of development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protocol increases cowpea breeding cycles from one field cycle to as many as eight chamber generations per year.

Outcome
breeding cyclese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8 generations per yeare0
Comparator
the traditional one cycle per year in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea breeding cycles can be increased from the traditional one cycle per year in the field to as many as 8 generations per year in regulated growth chamber conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2025 · show in text ↑

co2 · phenology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

humidity · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.