Paper · 1985 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Response of cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) to CO2 enrichment environment on growth, dry-matter production and yield components at different stages of vegetative and reproductive growth

Sheila Bhattacharya; N. C. Bhattacharya; P. K. Biswas; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY This study examines the effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations on vegetative and reproductive growth and partitioning of biomass during pod and seed development of cow pea in controlled environment chambers at 350, 675, and 1000μl CO 2 /l. The length of main stem and branches, the number of leaves and branches, and leaf area were all greater at high CO 2 than at low CO 2 concentration. The appearance of flowers was 10–12 days earlier in high CO 2 than in ambient CO 2 atmosphere. The senescence of leaves started about 7 days earlier in plants grown at 675 and 1000 μl CO 2 /l than in those grown at 350 μl CO 2 /l. The rate of leaf senescence was more rapid in 1000 μl/l than in 675 μl CO 2 /l. The dry weight of roots, stems and leaves increased with CO 2 enrichment, being greater in 675 μl/l than in 1000 μl CO 2 /l. Plants grown in 675 and 1000 μ1/1 produced more pods and seeds than in 350 μl CO 2 /l. Total seed weight and number of pods, as well as number of seeds per pod, were significantly greater in CO 2 enriched atmosphere than ambient CO 2 level. Although CO 2 enrichment caused a significant increase in the total number and weight of seeds as well as pods, it did not affect the ratio of seed dry weight to the total dry weight of above-ground plant parts (harvest index). It is concluded from the present investigation that CO 2 enrichment significantly enhanced vegetative as well as reproductive growth resulting in the increase in yield and early plant maturation in this leguminous crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased main stem and branch length, leaf and branch number, and leaf area.

Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
length of main stem and branches, the number of leaves and branches, and leaf areae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low CO 2 concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The length of main stem and branches, the number of leaves and branches, and leaf area were all greater at high CO 2 than at low CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowers appeared 10–12 days earlier under high CO2 than ambient CO2.

Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
appearance of flowerse0
Direction
earliere0
Value
10–12 dayse0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 atmospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The appearance of flowers was 10–12 days earlier in high CO 2 than in ambient CO 2 atmosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf senescence began about 7 days earlier at 675 and 1000 μl CO2/l than at 350 μl CO2/l.

Treatment
675 and 1000 μl CO 2 /le0
Outcome
senescence of leavese0
Direction
earliere0
Value
7 dayse0
Comparator
350 μl CO 2 /le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The senescence of leaves started about 7 days earlier in plants grown at 675 and 1000 μl CO 2 /l than in those grown at 350 μl CO 2 /l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf senescence was more rapid at 1000 than at 675 μl CO2/l.

Treatment
1000 μl/le0
Outcome
rate of leaf senescencee0
Direction
more rapide0
Comparator
675 μl CO 2 /le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rate of leaf senescence was more rapid in 1000 μl/l than in 675 μl CO 2 /l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased root, stem and leaf dry weight.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
dry weight of roots, stems and leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry weight of roots, stems and leaves increased with CO 2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root, stem and leaf dry weight was greater at 675 than 1000 μl CO2/l.

Treatment
675 μl/le0
Outcome
dry weight of roots, stems and leavese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
1000 μl CO 2 /le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry weight of roots, stems and leaves increased with CO 2 enrichment, being greater in 675 μl/l than in 1000 μl CO 2 /l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants at 675 and 1000 μl CO2/l produced more pods and seeds than at 350 μl CO2/l.

Treatment
675 and 1000 μ1/1e0
Outcome
pods and seedse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
350 μl CO 2 /le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants grown in 675 and 1000 μ1/1 produced more pods and seeds than in 350 μl CO 2 /l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment significantly increased total seed weight, pod number and seeds per pod.

Treatment
CO 2 enriched atmospheree0
Outcome
Total seed weight and number of pods, as well as number of seeds per pode0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total seed weight and number of pods, as well as number of seeds per pod, were significantly greater in CO 2 enriched atmosphere than ambient CO 2 level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not significantly affect harvest index.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente1
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“it did not affect the ratio of seed dry weight to the total dry weight of above-ground plant parts (harvest index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO 2 enrichment caused a significant increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1152 · show in text ↑

co2 · phenology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.