Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Influence ofPseudomonas fluorescens–Induced Plant Defenses on Efficacy of Nucleopolyhedrovirus ofHelicoverpa armigerain Okra and Tomato

S. Jeyarani; P. Karuppuchamy; N. Sathiah

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Baculovirus-based biopesticides like nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV) offer management opportunities against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). The plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens imparts induced systemic resistance due to enhanced phenolase activity, which could regulate disease expression by baculoviruses. The possibility of integrated use of H. armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus and P. fluorescens on okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench], cv. Arka Anamika, and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. PKM 1, against H. armigera was investigated. The Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus (HearNPV) was applied to fruit from pot-cultured okra and tomato previously treated with P. fluorescens as a seed treatment (ST), foliar application (FA), or in combination and bioassayed against third instar H. armigera. Application of P. fluorescens as ST and FA, alone or in combination with HearNPV, reduced larval and pupal weights of H. armigera that fed on okra and tomato fruits. Lower percentage mortality (31.25% and 36.25%) due to NPV was noticed in okra and tomato plants, respectively, treated with P. fluorescens through ST + FA. Increased levels of phenol, tannin, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase were recorded in P. fluorescens–treated plants than in untreated checks. Reduced consumption by H. armigera larvae and inactivation of baculoviruses due to defense-related enzyme induction in P. fluorescens–treated plants could be responsible for the reduction in NPV-induced mortality of H. armigera larvae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens treatment reduced weights of H. armigera larvae feeding on okra fruits.

Treatment
P. fluorescens as ST and FAe0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
larval and pupal weights of H. armigerae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens as ST and FA, alone or in combination with HearNPV, reduced larval and pupal weights of H. armigera that fed on okra and tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens treatment reduced weights of H. armigera pupae feeding on tomato fruits.

Treatment
P. fluorescens as ST and FAe0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
pupal weights of H. armigerae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. fluorescens as ST and FA, alone or in combination with HearNPV, reduced larval and pupal weights of H. armigera that fed on okra and tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV associated mortality of H. armigera was 31.25% in P. fluorescens treated okra.

Treatment
P. fluorescens through ST + FAe0
Interactor
NPVe0other
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
Lowere0
Value
31.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower percentage mortality (31.25% and 36.25%) due to NPV was noticed in okra and tomato plants, respectively, treated with P. fluorescens through ST + FA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV associated mortality of H. armigera was 36.25% in P. fluorescens treated tomato.

Treatment
P. fluorescens through ST + FAe0
Interactor
NPVe0other
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
Lowere0
Value
36.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower percentage mortality (31.25% and 36.25%) due to NPV was noticed in okra and tomato plants, respectively, treated with P. fluorescens through ST + FA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens treated okra plants had increased phenol and tannin levels.

Treatment
P. fluorescens–treatede0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
levels of phenol, tannine0
Direction
Increasede0
Comparator
untreated checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased levels of phenol, tannin, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase were recorded in P. fluorescens–treated plants than in untreated checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1330 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra and tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens treated tomato plants had increased peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase levels.

Treatment
P. fluorescens–treatede0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyasee0
Direction
Increasede0
Comparator
untreated checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased levels of phenol, tannin, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase were recorded in P. fluorescens–treated plants than in untreated checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1330 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra and tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1098 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that reduced larval consumption and virus inactivation from induced defenses could explain lower NPV mortality.

Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
reduction in NPV-induced mortality of H. armigera larvaee0
Qualifier
defense-related enzyme inductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced consumption by H. armigera larvae and inactivation of baculoviruses due to defense-related enzyme induction in P. fluorescens–treated plants could be responsible for the reduction in NPV-induced mortality of H. armigera larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1566 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench], cv. Arka Anamika, and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–492 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Helicoverpa armigera · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.