Abstract
Field experiment was conducted to evaluate eight integrated pest management (IPM) modules to control insect vector white fly which transmits the YVMV disease in okra. The IPM module i.e, seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of water was found most effective among all other modules to control YVMV disease, white fly population and okra leaf hopper. A maximum increase in yield and highest cost:benefit ratio were also achieved with the same module.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The specified IPM module was most effective among modules for YVMV disease.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of watere0
- Outcome
- YVMV diseasee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- all other modulese0
Not reportedInteractorInteractor role
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module i.e, seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of water was found most effective among all other modules to control YVMV disease, white fly population and okra leaf hopper.”
Claim · model-written summary
The specified IPM module was most effective among modules for white fly population.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of watere0
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly populatione0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- all other modulese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module i.e, seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of water was found most effective among all other modules to control YVMV disease, white fly population and okra leaf hopper.”
Claim · model-written summary
The specified IPM module was most effective among modules for okra leaf hopper.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of watere0
- Interactor
- okra leaf hoppere0pest
- Outcome
- okra leaf hoppere0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- all other modulese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The IPM module i.e, seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5ml/kg of seed, installation of yellow sticky trap @ 50/ha and spraying of Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.3 gm/lit. of water was found most effective among all other modules to control YVMV disease, white fly population and okra leaf hopper.”
Claim · model-written summary
The same IPM module produced a maximum yield increase.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximum increasee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum increase in yield and highest cost:benefit ratio were also achieved with the same module.”
t0“Evaluation of suitable IPM module for management of YVMV disease in okra under West Central Table Zone of Odisha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same IPM module gave the highest cost:benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- cost:benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A maximum increase in yield and highest cost:benefit ratio were also achieved with the same module.”
t0“Evaluation of suitable IPM module for management of YVMV disease in okra under West Central Table Zone of Odisha”
The same questions in other papers
acetamiprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →imidacloprid · organism · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
acetamiprid · organism · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
trap barrier · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →transgenic · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.