Paper · 2013 · Indian journal of plant protection

Efficacy of Newer Insecticides against Sucking Insect Pests of Okra

G K Sujay Anand; Ritesh Kumar Sharma; K. Shankarganesh; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during Kharif 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the efficacy of six newer insecticides against sucking insect pests on okra cv Arka Anamika. Thiamethoxam spraying recorded the lowest leafhopper population and all the six insecticides were significantly superior to control in both the years. Whitefly population was lowest in spiromesifen treated plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam produced the lowest leafhopper population.

Material
Arka Anamikat0
Treatment
Thiamethoxam sprayinge0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam spraying recorded the lowest leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–229 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra cv Arka Anamika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All six insecticides were significantly superior to control in both years.

Treatment
all the six insecticidese0
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
both the yearse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the six insecticides were significantly superior to control in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen treated plots had the lowest whitefly population.

Treatment
spiromesifene0
Interactor
Whiteflye0pest
Outcome
Whitefly populatione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whitefly population was lowest in spiromesifen treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

spiromesifen · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.