Abstract
Evaluation of Trichogramma brasiliense Ashmead, Ha NPV and endosulfan was carried out alone and in combination for the control of tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner).The studies were carried out for three years during 2006-2007 to 2007-2008. Based on the mean fruit damage and marketable yield, it was found that combination of T. brasiliense (5 releases at weekly interval @ 50,000/ha), Ha NPV (3 sprays at 10 day interval @ 1.5 x 10 POB s/ ha) and endosulfan (3 sprays at 15 day interval @ 700 g.a.i/ha) proved most effective for the management of H. armigera. The bioagents and endosulfan alone were less effective.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Combining T. brasiliense, Ha NPV and endosulfan was the most effective treatment against H. armigera on tomato, judged by mean fruit damage and marketable yield.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- combination of T. brasiliense (5 releases at weekly interval @ 50,000/ha), Ha NPV (3 sprays at 10 day interval @ 1.5 x 10 POB s/ ha) and endosulfan (3 sprays at 15 day interval @ 700 g.a.i/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Second interactor
- Trichogramma brasilienseTrichogramma brasiliensist0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- mean fruit damage and marketable yielde1
- Direction
- most effectivee1
- Comparator
- The bioagents and endosulfan alonee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy of Trichogramma brasiliense, nuclear polyhedrosis virus and endosulfan for the management of Helicoverpa armigera on tomato”
e1“Based on the mean fruit damage and marketable yield, it was found that combination of T. brasiliense (5 releases at weekly interval @ 50,000/ha), Ha NPV (3 sprays at 10 day interval @ 1.5 x 10 POB s/ ha) and endosulfan (3 sprays at 15 day interval @ 700 g.a.i/ha) proved most effective for the management of H. armigera”
e2“The bioagents and endosulfan alone were less effective”
Claim · model-written summary
The bioagents and endosulfan alone were less effective than the combination against H. armigera on tomato.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- The bioagents and endosulfan alonee2
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Second interactor
- Trichogramma brasilienseTrichogramma brasiliensist0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- mean fruit damage and marketable yielde1
- Direction
- less effectivee2
- Comparator
- combinatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy of Trichogramma brasiliense, nuclear polyhedrosis virus and endosulfan for the management of Helicoverpa armigera on tomato”
e1“Based on the mean fruit damage and marketable yield, it was found that combination of T. brasiliense (5 releases at weekly interval @ 50,000/ha)”
e2“The bioagents and endosulfan alone were less effective”
The same questions in other papers
endosulfan · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Trichogramma brasiliensis · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
biocontrol · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.