Paper · 2003 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Survival and colonization of rhizobacteria in a tomato transplant system

Zhinong Yan; M S Reddy; Joseph W Kloepper

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are used on crops most often as seed treatments; however, an alternative application method for transplanted vegetables is mixing PGPR into the soilless medium in which the transplants are grown. Studies were undertaken to compare root colonization and persistence of rifampicin-resistant mutants of PGPR strains Bacillus pumilus SE34 and Pseudomonas fluorescens 89B61, SE34r and 89B61r, on tomato as a function of application method. When the bacteria were incorporated into Promix soilless medium at log 6, 7, and 8 colony- forming units/g, populations of strain SE34r per gram of medium maintained the initial inoculum densities, while populations of 89B61r decreased approximately one to two orders of magnitude by 4 weeks after planting. The populations of each PGPR strain colonizing roots after application into the soilless medium showed a similar pattern at 6 weeks as that at 4 weeks after planting, with higher populations on the whole roots and lateral roots than on the taproots. Strain SE34r but not 89B61r moved upwards and colonized the phyllosphere when incorporated into the soilless medium. Following application as seed treatment, populations of SE34r were significantly higher on upper roots and on the taproot than were populations following application through the soilless medium. Conversely, populations were higher on lower roots and lateral roots following application through the soilless medium than were populations following application as seed treatment. While strain SE34 enhanced plant growth with application both to the medium and as seed treatment, the level of growth promotion was significantly greater with application in the soilless medium. The results indicate that PGPR can be successfully incorporated into soilless media in vegetable transplant production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SE34r maintained its initial medium population density.

Interactor
SE34re0symbiont
Outcome
populations of strain SE34r per gram of mediume0
Direction
maintainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of strain SE34r per gram of medium maintained the initial inoculum densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

89B61r populations in medium fell by one to two orders of magnitude after four weeks.

Interactor
89B61re0symbiont
Outcome
populations of 89B61re0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
one to two orders of magnitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of 89B61r decreased approximately one to two orders of magnitude by 4 weeks after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains colonized whole and lateral roots more densely than taproots at four and six weeks.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
populations on the whole roots and lateral rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
taprootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The populations of each PGPR strain colonizing roots after application into the soilless medium showed a similar pattern at 6 weeks as that at 4 weeks after planting, with higher populations on the whole roots and lateral roots than on the taproots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SE34r colonized the phyllosphere after medium incorporation.

Organ / stage
phyllospheree0
Interactor
SE34re0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the phyllospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain SE34r but not 89B61r moved upwards and colonized the phyllosphere when incorporated into the soilless medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

89B61r did not colonize the phyllosphere under medium incorporation.

Interactor
89B61re0symbiont
Outcome
not 89B61r moved upwards and colonized the phyllospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain SE34r but not 89B61r moved upwards and colonized the phyllosphere when incorporated into the soilless medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment produced higher SE34r populations on upper roots and taproot than medium application.

Treatment
application as seed treatmente0
Interactor
SE34re0symbiont
Outcome
populations of SE34re0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
application through the soilless mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following application as seed treatment, populations of SE34r were significantly higher on upper roots and on the taproot than were populations following application through the soilless medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium application produced higher bacterial populations on lower and lateral roots than seed treatment.

Organ / stage
lower roots and lateral rootse0
Treatment
application through the soilless mediume0
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
application as seed treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations were higher on lower roots and lateral roots following application through the soilless medium than were populations following application as seed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SE34 promoted tomato growth through both application routes.

Treatment
strain SE34e0
Interactor
SE34e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain SE34 enhanced plant growth with application both to the medium and as seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium application promoted growth more than seed treatment.

Treatment
application in the soilless mediume0
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
seed treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of growth promotion was significantly greater with application in the soilless medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1726 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“both to the medium and as seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1628 · show in text ↑

in vitro · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

growing medium · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 93 positive, 30 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.