Paper · 1992 · Phytopathology

Induction of Resistance Towards Bacterial Pathogens of Tomato by Exposure of the Host to Dinitroaniline Herbicides

R. Cohen

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth of tomato seedlings (cv. Bonny Best) in rooting substrate amended with the dinitroaniline herbicide, dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v), caused a suppression in bacterial wilt symptoms caused by the Pseudomonas solanacearum strain K60. Dinitramine was not inhibitory to P. solanacearum in in vitro assays nor did it restrict multiplication of the pathogen in treated plants (...)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine in the rooting substrate suppressed bacterial wilt symptoms in tomato seedlings caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum.

Material
cv. Bonny Beste1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v)e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
bacterial wilt symptomse1
Direction
suppressione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Growth of tomato seedlings (cv. Bonny Best) in rooting substrate amended with the dinitroaniline herbicide, dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v), caused a suppression in bacterial wilt symptoms caused by the Pseudomonas solanacearum strain K60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine was not inhibitory to P. solanacearum in in vitro assays.

Treatment
Dinitraminee2
Interactor
P. solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory to P. solanacearume2
Direction
not inhibitorye2
Setting
in vitro assayse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Growth of tomato seedlings (cv. Bonny Best) in rooting substrate amended with the dinitroaniline herbicide, dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v), caused a suppression in bacterial wilt symptoms caused by the Pseudomonas solanacearum strain K60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–259 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dinitramine was not inhibitory to P. solanacearum in in vitro assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine did not restrict multiplication of the pathogen in treated tomato plants.

Treatment
dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v)e1
Interactor
P. solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
multiplication of the pathogene3
Direction
nor did it restricte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Growth of tomato seedlings (cv. Bonny Best) in rooting substrate amended with the dinitroaniline herbicide, dinitramine (1 ppm in sand/Pro-mix, 1:1 or 1:2, v/v), caused a suppression in bacterial wilt symptoms caused by the Pseudomonas solanacearum strain K60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–259 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dinitramine was not inhibitory to P. solanacearum in in vitro assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–329 · show in text ↑
e3

“nor did it restrict multiplication of the pathogen in treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–398 · show in text ↑

growing medium · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

growing medium · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.