Paper · 2012 · Functional Plant Biology

Pest and disease abundance and dynamics in wheat and oilseed rape as affected by elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations

Viktoriya Oehme; Petra Högy; Jürgen Franzaring; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Future atmospheric CO2 concentrations are predicted to increase, and directly affect host plant phenology, which, in turn, is assumed to mediate the performance of herbivorous insects indirectly as well as the abundance and epidemiology of plant diseases. In a 4-year field experiment, spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino) were grown using a mini- free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) system, which consisted of a control (CON), an ambient treatment (AMB) and FACE treatments. The CON and AMB treatments did not receive additional CO2, whereas the FACE plots were moderately elevated by 150μLL-1 CO2. The impact of elevated CO2 was examined with regard to plant phenology, biomass, leaf nitrogen and carbon, abundance of insect pest species and their relative population growth by either direct counts or yellow sticky traps. Occurrence and damage of plants by pathogens on spring wheat and oilseed rape were directly assessed. Disease infestations on plants were not significantly different between ambient and elevated CO2 in any of the years. Plant phenology, aboveground biomass, foliar nitrogen and carbon concentrations were also not significantly affected by CO2 enrichment. In contrast, the abundance of some species of insects was significantly influenced by elevated CO2, showing either an increase or a decrease in infestation intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease infestations on wheat and oilseed rape were not significantly different between ambient and elevated CO2 in any year.

Taxon
spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino)Brassica napusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
elevated CO2e1
Outcome
Disease infestationse1
Direction
not significantly differente1
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease infestations on plants were not significantly different between ambient and elevated CO2 in any of the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant phenology and aboveground biomass were not significantly affected by CO2 enrichment in wheat and oilseed rape.

Taxon
spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino)Brassica napusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente2
Outcome
Plant phenology, aboveground biomasse2
Direction
not significantly affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant phenology, aboveground biomass, foliar nitrogen and carbon concentrations were also not significantly affected by CO2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen and carbon concentrations were not significantly affected by CO2 enrichment in wheat and oilseed rape.

Taxon
spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino)Brassica napusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente2
Outcome
foliar nitrogen and carbon concentrationse2
Direction
not significantly affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant phenology, aboveground biomass, foliar nitrogen and carbon concentrations were also not significantly affected by CO2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly influenced the abundance of some insect species, with either an increase or a decrease.

Taxon
spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino)Brassica napusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Interactor
insectsInsectae3pest
Outcome
abundance of some species of insectse3
Direction
an increase or a decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Triso) and spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Campino) were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e3

“the abundance of some species of insects was significantly influenced by elevated CO2, showing either an increase or a decrease in infestation intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1406 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.