Paper · 2017 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Grain yield and quality responses of wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter to combined climate change factors

Heiko Weichert; Petra Högy; Isabel Mora-Ramirez; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop yield stability must be ensured under future climate conditions such as elevated CO2 and high temperatures. We tested 'HOSUT', a winter wheat line expressing a grain-targeted sucrose transporter of barley in response to combinations of CO2 enrichment, a heat wave, and high nitrogen fertilization. Compared with wild-type Certo, HOSUT had a superior performance for grain yield, aboveground biomass, and ears per plant, obviously due to transgene activity in developing grains and young vegetative sinks. HOSUT grains were larger and contained more endosperm cells. HOSUT and high CO2 effects similarly improved phenological and yield-related traits. Significant HOSUT-CO2 interactions for biomass of stems, ears, grain yield, nitrogen yield, and grain number revealed that Certo was promoted by CO2 enrichment, whereas HOSUT responded weakly. CO2 enrichment strongly reduced and HOSUT effects weakly reduced grain nitrogen, storage proteins, and free amino acids. In contrast to CO2 enrichment, HOSUT effects did not impair grain micronutrient concentrations. Significant HOSUT-nitrogen fertilization interactions for ear biomass, grain yield, grain number per plant, and harvest index indicated that HOSUT benefited more from additional nitrogen. The heat wave decreased aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index, grain size, and starch and water use, but increased grain sucrose concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT had higher grain yield, aboveground biomass and ears per plant than wild-type Certo.

Material
HOSUTe0
Outcome
grain yield, aboveground biomass, and ears per plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
wild-type Certoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with wild-type Certo, HOSUT had a superior performance for grain yield, aboveground biomass, and ears per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT grains were larger and contained more endosperm cells.

Material
HOSUTe0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
larger and contained more endosperm cellse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HOSUT grains were larger and contained more endosperm cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT improved phenological and yield-related traits.

Material
HOSUTe0
Outcome
phenological and yield-related traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HOSUT and high CO2 effects similarly improved phenological and yield-related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 improved phenological and yield-related traits.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
phenological and yield-related traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HOSUT and high CO2 effects similarly improved phenological and yield-related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment promoted biomass of stems and ears, grain yield, nitrogen yield and grain number in Certo more than HOSUT.

Material
Certoe0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
biomass of stems, ears, grain yield, nitrogen yield, and grain numbere0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
HOSUTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant HOSUT-CO2 interactions for biomass of stems, ears, grain yield, nitrogen yield, and grain number revealed that Certo was promoted by CO2 enrichment, whereas HOSUT responded weakly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment strongly reduced grain nitrogen, storage proteins and free amino acids.

Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
grain nitrogen, storage proteins, and free amino acidse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 enrichment strongly reduced and HOSUT effects weakly reduced grain nitrogen, storage proteins, and free amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT weakly reduced grain nitrogen, storage proteins and free amino acids.

Material
HOSUTe0
Outcome
grain nitrogen, storage proteins, and free amino acidse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
weaklye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 enrichment strongly reduced and HOSUT effects weakly reduced grain nitrogen, storage proteins, and free amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT did not impair grain micronutrient concentrations.

Material
HOSUTe0
Outcome
grain micronutrient concentrationse0
Direction
did not impaire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HOSUT effects did not impair grain micronutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HOSUT benefited more from additional nitrogen in ear biomass, grain yield, grain number and harvest index.

Material
HOSUTe0
Treatment
additional nitrogene0
Outcome
ear biomass, grain yield, grain number per plant, and harvest indexe0
Direction
benefited moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant HOSUT-nitrogen fertilization interactions for ear biomass, grain yield, grain number per plant, and harvest index indicated that HOSUT benefited more from additional nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat wave decreased aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index and grain size.

Treatment
heat wavee0
Outcome
aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index, grain sizee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The heat wave decreased aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index, grain size, and starch and water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat wave decreased starch and water use.

Treatment
heat wavee0
Outcome
starch and water usee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The heat wave decreased aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index, grain size, and starch and water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat wave increased grain sucrose concentration.

Treatment
heat wavee1
Outcome
grain sucrose concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but increased grain sucrose concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“The heat wave decreased aboveground and ear biomass, grain yield, harvest index, grain size, and starch and water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat expressing a barley sucrose transporter to combined climate change factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–117 · show in text ↑

heat · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

62 papers: 26 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heat · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 2 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.