Paper · 2006 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

Efficacy of natural compounds used for thinning in organic apple orchards

A. Basak

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A B S T R A C T In organic fruit production the use of chemical -synthetic thinning agents or plant hormones for crop regulation is not allowed. To replace them, trials on thinning by means of substances occurring naturally in the environment, which can damage the weaker flowers or affect pollen germination adversely, were conducted in Poland in 2003-2005 on apple trees cvs. ‘Gala Must’, ‘Jonagold Decosta’, ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘S ampion’. It was found that Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil) reduced fruit set, positively affected apple size, commercial yield, the red colour of apples, and sometimes, flowering in the next year. However, it also produced phytotoxic effects and increased russeting of fruits. Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming. Another preparation tested – Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan) produced no thinning effect but distinctly improved the vigour of flowers and leaves, which sometimes resulted in a better growth of fruits and a more intense red colour on the fruit surface with slightly less russeting. Other preparations – garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic), used as a mixture, did not show thinning effects, but reduced russeting and sometimes increased fruit weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olejan reduced apple fruit set.

Treatment
Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil)e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil) reduced fruit set, positively affected apple size, commercial yield, the red colour of apples, and sometimes, flowering in the next year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olejan improved apple size, commercial yield, and red color.

Treatment
Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil)e0
Outcome
apple size, commercial yield, the red colour of applese0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil) reduced fruit set, positively affected apple size, commercial yield, the red colour of apples, and sometimes, flowering in the next year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olejan sometimes improved next-year flowering.

Treatment
Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil)e0
Outcome
flowering in the next yeare0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that Olejan 85 EC (85% rape oil) reduced fruit set, positively affected apple size, commercial yield, the red colour of apples, and sometimes, flowering in the next year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olejan produced phytotoxic effects.

Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, it also produced phytotoxic effects and increased russeting of fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olejan increased fruit russeting.

Outcome
russeting of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, it also produced phytotoxic effects and increased russeting of fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NuFilm improved flower vigor and apple surface quality.

Treatment
NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene)e0
Outcome
flower vigour and apple surface qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NuFilm usually did not change fruit set.

Treatment
NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene)e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NuFilm often increased fruit size.

Treatment
NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene)e0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NuFilm sometimes reduced apple color, firmness, refraction, and subsequent blooming.

Treatment
NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene)e0
Outcome
the red colour, firmness, and refraction of applese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NuFilm sometimes reduced subsequent blooming.

Treatment
NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene)e0
Outcome
subsequent bloominge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation – NuFilm 96 EC (di-1-Pmenthene) improved flower vigour and apple surface quality. Most frequently, it did not affect, let alone improve, fruit set. In spite of that, it often caused an increase in fruit size. Sometimes, it also reduced the red colour, firmness, and refraction of apples as well as subsequent blooming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochicol did not thin fruit.

Treatment
Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan)e0
Outcome
thinning effecte0
Direction
no thinning effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation tested – Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan) produced no thinning effect but distinctly improved the vigour of flowers and leaves, which sometimes resulted in a better growth of fruits and a more intense red colour on the fruit surface with slightly less russeting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochicol improved flower and leaf vigor.

Treatment
Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan)e0
Outcome
vigour of flowers and leavese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation tested – Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan) produced no thinning effect but distinctly improved the vigour of flowers and leaves, which sometimes resulted in a better growth of fruits and a more intense red colour on the fruit surface with slightly less russeting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochicol sometimes improved fruit growth and red color.

Treatment
Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan)e0
Outcome
growth of fruits and a more intense red coloure0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation tested – Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan) produced no thinning effect but distinctly improved the vigour of flowers and leaves, which sometimes resulted in a better growth of fruits and a more intense red colour on the fruit surface with slightly less russeting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochicol slightly reduced russeting.

Treatment
Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan)e0
Outcome
russetinge0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another preparation tested – Biochicol 020 PC (chitosan) produced no thinning effect but distinctly improved the vigour of flowers and leaves, which sometimes resulted in a better growth of fruits and a more intense red colour on the fruit surface with slightly less russeting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic soap and Bioczos did not thin fruit.

Treatment
garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic)e0
Outcome
thinning effectse0
Direction
did not showe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other preparations – garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic), used as a mixture, did not show thinning effects, but reduced russeting and sometimes increased fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic soap and Bioczos reduced russeting.

Treatment
garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic)e0
Outcome
russetinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other preparations – garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic), used as a mixture, did not show thinning effects, but reduced russeting and sometimes increased fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic soap and Bioczos sometimes increased fruit weight.

Treatment
garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other preparations – garlic soap and Bioczos (an extract of garlic), used as a mixture, did not show thinning effects, but reduced russeting and sometimes increased fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Allium sativum · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Brassica napus · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.