Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

Efficacy of Brassicaceous Seed Meal Formulations for the Control of Apple Replant Disease in Conventional and Organic Production Systems

Mark Mazzola; Jack Brown

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
67
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of brassicaceous seed meals for the control of apple replant disease and the effects of such treatments on the causal pathogen complex were examined in conventional and organic production systems. When used in conjunction with a postplant application of mefenoxam, Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba seed meal soil amendments were as effective as preplant fumigation of soil with 1,3-dichloropropene-chloropicrin in terms of disease control, tree growth, and overall fruit yields of Gala/M26. Brassica napus seed meal amendment-mefenoxam soil drench also enhanced yields in a manner comparable to preplant fumigation, but vegetative growth was intermediate between the control and fumigation treatments. When applied alone, seed meal amendments failed to enhance tree growth or control disease to the level attained in response to soil fumigation. Postplant mefenoxam treatments revealed that failure of seed meal amendments to enhance tree growth and yield when used independently was due, at least in part, to increased apple root infection by Pythium spp. in B. napus and S. alba seed meal-amended soils, and by Phytophthora cambivora in B. juncea-amended soil. As mefenoxam treatment is not compatible with organic cropping systems, a seed meal blend was formulated which, based upon biological activity, was predicted to suppress known components of the target pathogen complex without need of additional treatment. Gala/M26 trees planted in soils treated with a 1:1 ratio of B. juncea:B. napus seed meal blend performed as well in terms of disease control and vegetative growth as trees cultivated in fumigated soil at an organic-certified orchard. Because these trials utilized the highly susceptible rootstock M26, the results demonstrate that these amendments are a viable alternative to soil fumigation for the control of apple replant disease in both conventional and organic systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica juncea seed meal with mefenoxam matched fumigation for disease control, growth and yield.

Material
Gala/M26e0
Treatment
Brassica junceae0
Outcome
disease control, tree growth, and overall fruit yieldse0
Direction
as effective ase0
Comparator
preplant fumigation of soil with 1,3-dichloropropene-chloropicrine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba seed meal soil amendments were as effective as preplant fumigation of soil with 1,3-dichloropropene-chloropicrin in terms of disease control, tree growth, and overall fruit yields of Gala/M26.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sinapis alba seed meal with mefenoxam matched fumigation for disease control, growth and yield.

Material
Gala/M26e0
Treatment
Sinapis albae0
Outcome
disease control, tree growth, and overall fruit yieldse0
Direction
as effective ase0
Comparator
preplant fumigation of soil with 1,3-dichloropropene-chloropicrine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba seed meal soil amendments were as effective as preplant fumigation of soil with 1,3-dichloropropene-chloropicrin in terms of disease control, tree growth, and overall fruit yields of Gala/M26.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica napus seed meal with mefenoxam enhanced yield comparably to fumigation.

Treatment
Brassica napus seed meal amendment-mefenoxam soil drenche0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
preplant fumigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica napus seed meal amendment-mefenoxam soil drench also enhanced yields in a manner comparable to preplant fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica napus treatment gave vegetative growth intermediate between control and fumigation.

Treatment
Brassica napuse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
intermediatee0
Comparator
the control and fumigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica napus seed meal amendment-mefenoxam soil drench also enhanced yields in a manner comparable to preplant fumigation, but vegetative growth was intermediate between the control and fumigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed meal amendments alone did not match fumigation for tree growth or disease control.

Treatment
seed meal amendmentse0
Outcome
tree growth or control diseasee0
Direction
failed to enhancee0
Comparator
soil fumigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied alone, seed meal amendments failed to enhance tree growth or control disease to the level attained in response to soil fumigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus seed meal alone increased apple root infection by Pythium spp.

Treatment
B. napuse0
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
apple root infection by Pythium spp.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased apple root infection by Pythium spp. in B. napus and S. alba seed meal-amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. alba seed meal alone increased apple root infection by Pythium spp.

Treatment
S. albae0
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
apple root infection by Pythium spp.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased apple root infection by Pythium spp. in B. napus and S. alba seed meal-amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. juncea seed meal alone increased apple root infection by Phytophthora cambivora.

Treatment
B. junceae0
Interactor
Phytophthora cambivorae0pathogen
Outcome
Phytophthora cambivorae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by Phytophthora cambivora in B. juncea-amended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1:1 B. juncea:B. napus blend matched fumigated soil for disease control and vegetative growth.

Material
Gala/M26e0
Treatment
1:1 ratio of B. juncea:B. napus seed meal blende0
Outcome
disease control and vegetative growthe0
Direction
performed as welle0
Comparator
trees cultivated in fumigated soile0
Setting
organic-certified orcharde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gala/M26 trees planted in soils treated with a 1:1 ratio of B. juncea:B. napus seed meal blend performed as well in terms of disease control and vegetative growth as trees cultivated in fumigated soil at an organic-certified orchard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Replant Disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify seed meal amendments as a viable alternative to fumigation for apple replant disease.

Outcome
viable alternative to soil fumigation for the control of apple replant diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these amendments are a viable alternative to soil fumigation for the control of apple replant disease in both conventional and organic systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1906 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Brassica juncea · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Brassica juncea · organism · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Brassica napus · Pythium · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Brassica napus · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.