Paper · 2007 · Egyptian Journal of Biotechnology

Biological control of necrotrophic plant pathogenic fungi: Tomato plants as a model

O A Wahid

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened in a laboratory experiment against 6 necrotrophic fungi. These fungi were isolated from diseased plant materials. This biocontrol agent exhibited different potentials. It was highly effective against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici which causes tomato wilt and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae which causes broad bean wilt. It inhibited radial growth (RGI) by more than 75 %. However, it was less effective against Phytophthora infestans (64.7 % RGI), Botrytis cinerea (58.3 % RGI), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (57.4 % RGI) Rhizoctonia solani (42.7 % RGI). When B. subtilis was applied to Tomato field, it exhibited different efficiency in suppressing Fusarium wilt. Time of implementation was critical for the efficacy of B. subtilis. It strongly suppressed wilt when applied 7 days before transplanting, by showing 72.7, healthy plant percentage (HP), followed by application at cotyledon stage (69.4 % HP). Salicylic acid was comparable to B. subtilis in protecting tomato against vascular wilt (68.3 % HP). Different mechanisms may be involved in the activity of B. subtilis in field. According to the laboratory test, diffusible suppressive substances as well as lytic enzymes may be produced by this biocontrol agent.Egyptian Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 25 (1) 2007: pp. 1-12

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici radial growth by more than 75%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth (RGI)e0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
more than 75 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“highly effective against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici which causes tomato wilt and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae which causes broad bean wilt. It inhibited radial growth (RGI) by more than 75 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae radial growth by more than 75%.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabaeFusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabaee0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth (RGI)e0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
more than 75 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae which causes broad bean wilt. It inhibited radial growth (RGI) by more than 75 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Phytophthora infestans radial growth by 64.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
RGIe0
Direction
less effectivee0
Value
64.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“less effective against Phytophthora infestans (64.7 % RGI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–505 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Botrytis cinerea radial growth by 58.3%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
RGIe0
Value
58.3 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Botrytis cinerea (58.3 % RGI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Sclerotinia sclerotiorum radial growth by 57.4%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
RGIe0
Value
57.4 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (57.4 % RGI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Rhizoctonia solani radial growth by 42.7%.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilise1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
RGIe0
Value
42.7 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizoctonia solani (42.7 % RGI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying B. subtilis seven days before transplanting strongly suppressed tomato wilt, with 72.7 healthy plant percentage.

Treatment
B. subtilise1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
healthy plant percentage (HP)e0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
72.7e0
Qualifier
7 days before transplantinge0
Setting
Tomato fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“It strongly suppressed wilt when applied 7 days before transplanting, by showing 72.7, healthy plant percentage (HP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“When B. subtilis was applied to Tomato field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying B. subtilis at the cotyledon stage yielded 69.4% healthy tomato plants.

Organ / stage
cotyledon stagee0
Treatment
B. subtilise1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
HPe0
Value
69.4 %e0
Setting
Tomato fielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by application at cotyledon stage (69.4 % HP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“When B. subtilis was applied to Tomato field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid protected tomato against vascular wilt with 68.3% healthy plants, comparable to B. subtilis.

Treatment
Salicylic acide0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
vascular wilt (68.3 % HP)e0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
68.3 %e0
Comparator
B. subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salicylic acid was comparable to B. subtilis in protecting tomato against vascular wilt (68.3 % HP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1061 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The laboratory assay suggested Bacillus subtilis may produce diffusible suppressive substances and lytic enzymes.

Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diffusible suppressive substances as well as lytic enzymese0
Qualifier
may be producede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“According to the laboratory test, diffusible suppressive substances as well as lytic enzymes may be produced by this biocontrol agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biocontrol agent, Bacillus subtilis, was screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fabae · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.