Paper · 2022 · Plants

Endophytic Bacillus subtilis SR22 Triggers Defense Responses in Tomato against Rhizoctonia Root Rot

Younes M. Rashad; Sara A. Abdalla; Mohamed M. Sleem

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
41
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rhizoctonia root rot is one of the most destructive diseases of tomato and other crops. The biocontrol of plant diseases using endophytic bacteria has gained significant attention due to their distinct advantages compared with the free-living ones, as well as their new unexplored and unique properties. Endophytic Bacillus subtilis SR22 represents a promising and more effective biocontrol and growth-promoting agent for tomato plants than the free-living agents, being an ecofriendly and sustainable tool in modern agriculture. In this study, the direct antagonistic activity of B. subtilis SR22 was investigated against Rhizoctonia solani in vitro. The biocontrol activity of B. subtilis SR22 against Rhizoctonia root rot of tomato was also investigated. Effects on the level of the transcriptional expression of defense-related genes, biochemical responses, and the vegetative growth of tomato plants were also studied. The dual culture test showed 51% inhibition in the mycelial growth of R. solani due to B. subtilis SR22, indicating its potent antagonistic behavior. Using a GC-MS analysis, twenty bioactive compounds were detected to be produced by B. subtilis SR22, including chlorogenic acid, pyrrolo [1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro, propyl thioglycolic acid, phthalic acid, and 2,3-butanediol. Under greenhouse conditions, the application of B. subtilis SR22 led to a reduction (up to 51%) in Rhizoctonia root rot of tomato. Furthermore, an upregulation in the expression of the responsive factor JERF3 (10.9-fold) and the defense-related genes POD (9.1-fold) and PR1 (4.5-fold) in tomato plants was recorded due to the application of B. subtilis SR22. In addition, this treatment enhanced the total phenolic content (76.8%) and activity of the antioxidant enzymes POD (56%) and PPO (29.2%) in tomato roots, indicating its resistance-inducing effect on tomato plants. Moreover, this treatment enhanced most of the evaluated growth parameters in tomato plants (up to 35%). We can conclude that B. subtilis SR22 is a promising biocontrol agent and growth promoter in tomato plants against Rhizoctonia root rot. An evaluation of the formulation and field application of this bio-agent is necessary in future studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 inhibited R. solani mycelial growth by 51% in dual culture.

Treatment
B. subtilis SR22e0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of R. solanie0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dual culture test showed 51% inhibition in the mycelial growth of R. solani due to B. subtilis SR22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GC-MS detected twenty bioactive compounds produced by B. subtilis SR22.

Interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bioactive compounds were detected to be produced by B. subtilis SR22e0
Value
twentye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“twenty bioactive compounds were detected to be produced by B. subtilis SR22, including chlorogenic acid, pyrrolo [1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro, propyl thioglycolic acid, phthalic acid, and 2,3-butanediol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 reduced tomato Rhizoctonia root rot by up to 51% in greenhouse conditions.

Treatment
application of B. subtilis SR22e0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Rhizoctonia root rote0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 51%e0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, the application of B. subtilis SR22 led to a reduction (up to 51%) in Rhizoctonia root rot of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased tomato JERF3 expression 10.9-fold.

Treatment
application of B. subtilis SR22e0
Interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Gene
JERF3e0
Outcome
expression of the responsive factor JERF3e0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
10.9-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an upregulation in the expression of the responsive factor JERF3 (10.9-fold) and the defense-related genes POD (9.1-fold) and PR1 (4.5-fold) in tomato plants was recorded due to the application of B. subtilis SR22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased tomato POD gene expression 9.1-fold.

Treatment
application of B. subtilis SR22e0
Interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Gene
PODe0
Outcome
defense-related genes PODe0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
9.1-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an upregulation in the expression of the responsive factor JERF3 (10.9-fold) and the defense-related genes POD (9.1-fold) and PR1 (4.5-fold) in tomato plants was recorded due to the application of B. subtilis SR22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased tomato PR1 gene expression 4.5-fold.

Treatment
application of B. subtilis SR22e0
Interactor
B. subtilis SR22Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Gene
PR1e0
Outcome
PR1e0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
4.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an upregulation in the expression of the responsive factor JERF3 (10.9-fold) and the defense-related genes POD (9.1-fold) and PR1 (4.5-fold) in tomato plants was recorded due to the application of B. subtilis SR22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased total phenolic content in tomato roots by 76.8%.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
76.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment enhanced the total phenolic content (76.8%) and activity of the antioxidant enzymes POD (56%) and PPO (29.2%) in tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased tomato root POD activity by 56%.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Gene
PODe0
Outcome
activity of the antioxidant enzymes PODe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment enhanced the total phenolic content (76.8%) and activity of the antioxidant enzymes POD (56%) and PPO (29.2%) in tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased tomato root PPO activity by 29.2%.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Gene
PPOe0
Outcome
activity of the antioxidant enzymes POD (56%) and PPOe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
29.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment enhanced the total phenolic content (76.8%) and activity of the antioxidant enzymes POD (56%) and PPO (29.2%) in tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SR22 increased most measured tomato growth parameters by up to 35%.

Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
up to 35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment enhanced most of the evaluated growth parameters in tomato plants (up to 35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–1986 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Rhizoctonia · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.