Paper · 2003

Effects of foliar application with effective microorganisms on leaf metabolism and seed yield in soybean.

Shousong Yue; Cuiping Wang; Xu HuiLian; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism are the most important physiological and biochemical processes in soybean plants. It is important to find agronomical practices to improve these metabolic processes in order to increase grain yield and quality. In this study, a field experiment was conducted using effective microorganisms (EM) to see whether EM can show the expected effects on soybean plants, with three treatments of EM spray concentrations, 0% (CK), 0.1%, and 0.5% at flowering (August 4) and podding (August 14) stages. Metabolic changes of soybean leaves were measured on August 8, August 19, August 29 and September 9 with the 16th, 18th, 18th, 21st functional leaves separately. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in functional leaves were increased by EM treatments. Nitrate reductase (NR) activities were improved by EM spray treatments. As a consequence, spraying EM increased seed protein and crude fat concentration and increased seed yield. Introduction Foliar applications of plant growth regulators or chemicals are widely used in crop and vegetable cultivation to promote plant growth and enhance yield especially under adverse environmental conditions such as nutrient deficiency and drought. Bio-products and microbial inoculants have been introduced to modern agriculture to produce food with good quality and safety in recent years. A microbial inoculant containing many kinds of naturally occurring beneficial microbes called Effective Microorganisms has been used widely in nature and organic farming (Xu, 2000a). Studies have shown that applying EM increase crop productivity and diseases resistance (Iwaishi, 2000; Mridha et al, 1999; Samy et al, 1995; Sangakara, 1995; Wang et al, 1999; Xu, 2000b; Yamada et al, 2000). However, the mechanism of the effect of EM was not clear in many aspects and there might exist some kinds of active substances in the fermented solution (Xu, 2000b). So far, we know little about whether EM affects seed yield and seed quality in soybean plants. In the present study, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and nitrate reductase (NR) activity of functional leaves were measured, and seed yield and seed quality were analyzed in field-grown soybean plants with foliar application of diluted EM solutions. Materials Soybean plants (Gycine max cv Liaodou 10) were grown in plots each with an area of and Methods 5.0x3.0 m. The plots were in randomized block design with three replications. Plant density was 1.95x10 h with a 0.6-m row spacing and a 0.093-m plant spacing. Organic fertilizer and diammonium phosphate were applied at 15,000 kg h and 225 kg h, respectively. Foliar applications of EM diluted at 1:1000(0.1% EM) and at 1:500(0.5% EM) were conducted at flowering (August 4) and podding (August 14) stages. The control (C) was spraying water. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of leaves were measured using a LI-6200 Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Inc NE USA) on a clear day during 10:00 12:00 am, with gentle wind and a photosynthetic photon fluxes over 1200 μmol m s. Nitrate reductase (NR) activity in leaves was measured using the live-tissue method. Results and Photosynthesis in functional leaves Discussion Photosynthesis is one of the most important factors that affects soybean seed yield. As shown in Table 1, photosynthesis was much higher in 0.1% EM than in C at the stages of August 19 (p Soybean plants treated with diluted EM solution (at 0.1% and 0.5%) produced more seed yield with higher protein and crude fat concentration. These were due to the higher nitrate reductase activity and photosynthetic capacity that benefited from higher leaf stomatal conductance in functional leaves during mid-growth period. Results of the present study suggest that EM can be used as a regulation substance to improve metabolisms of crop plants for yield promotion and quality improvement. References Iwaishi Shinji. 2000. Effect of organic fertilizer and effective microorganisms on growth, yield and quality of paddy-rice varieties. In:Hui-Lian Xu. James F. Parr and Huroshi Umemura (ed.), Nature Farming and Microbial Applications, 269-274. Mridha, M.A.U., H.U. Chowdhuary, H.L. Xu and H. Umemura. 1999. Influence of effective microorganisms on seed germination and growth of some crop p lants. In: Hui-Lian Xu (ed.), Nature Farming and Sustainable Environment 127-130. Sangakkara, U.R. 1995. Effects of EM on vegetable production in Sri Lanka: An economic analysis. In: Kyusei Nature Farming (Fourth International Conference), 217-222. Wang Ran, Hui-Lian Xu and M.A.U. Mridha. 1999. Effects of organic fertilization and EM inoculation on leaf photosynthesis and fruit yield and quality of tomato plants. In: Hui-Lian Xu (ed.), Nature Farming and Sustainable Environment 119-126 Samy, J., A. Xaviar, A.B. Rahman and H. A. H. Sharifuddin. 1995. Effect of EM on rice production and methane emission from paddy fields in Malaysia. In: Kyusei Nature Farming (Fourth International Conference), 208-210. Xu Hui-Lian. 2000a. Nature farming: History, principles and perspectives. Journal of Crop Production. 3 (1), 1-10. Xu Hui-Lian. 2000b. Effects of a microbial inoculant and oganic fertilizers on the growth, photosynthesis and yield of sweet corn. In:Hui-Lian Xu. James F. Parr and Huroshi Umemura (ed.), Nature Farming and Microbial Applications, 139-156. Yamada Kengo and Hui-Lian Xu. 2000. Properties and applications of an organic fertilizer inoculated with effective microorganisms. Journal of Crop Production. 3 (1), 255-268.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM spray increased soybean leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
functional leavese0
Treatment
EM treatmentse0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in functional leaves were increased by EM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM spray improved soybean leaf nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
EM spray treatmentse0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Gene
Nitrate reductase (NR)e0
Outcome
Nitrate reductase (NR) activitiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reductase (NR) activities were improved by EM spray treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM spray increased soybean seed protein and crude fat concentrations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
spraying EMe0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Outcome
seed protein and crude fat concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying EM increased seed protein and crude fat concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM spray increased soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
spraying EMe0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying EM increased seed protein and crude fat concentration and increased seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute higher soybean seed yield and quality to nitrate reductase and photosynthesis supported by stomatal conductance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Qualifier
higher leaf stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These were due to the higher nitrate reductase activity and photosynthetic capacity that benefited from higher leaf stomatal conductance in functional leaves during mid-growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3539–3721 · show in text ↑
e1

“produced more seed yield with higher protein and crude fat concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3465–3537 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest EM can improve crop metabolism, yield and quality.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Outcome
EM can be used as a regulation substance to improve metabolisms of crop plants for yield promotion and quality improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the present study suggest that EM can be used as a regulation substance to improve metabolisms of crop plants for yield promotion and quality improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3723–3887 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

application · physiology: enzyme activity · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

application · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

400 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.