Paper · 2024 · Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems

Influence of Bradyrhizobium japonicum on the growth parameters and formation of the assimilation apparatus in E-gene isogenic lines of soybean

D. V. Hlushach; O. O. Avksentieva

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia on the assimilation apparatus functioning and biomass accumulation in different soybean lines with varying photoperiod sensitivity. Nearly isogenic lines (NILs) of soybean were used, with genes E1, E2, and E3 in different allelic states: Clark (e1E2E3), L80-5879 (E1e2e3), L63-3117 (e1e2E3), and L71-920 (e1e2e3). The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b. Plants were grown under natural long-day conditions (16 hours). Growth indicators of the studied lines, such as relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf area ratio (LAR), and specific leaf area (SLA), were analyzed, as well as the content of chlorophylls A and B in the V3 and V5 developmental stages. The results demonstrate that the influence of rhizobia on the functioning of the assimilation apparatus and biomass accumulation depends on the soybean line genotype. In the study, RGR, which characterizes the biomass accumulation rate, has similar trends to those observed with NAR, characterizing the assimilation apparatus's functioning. However, each line showed its own tendencies. For instance, in the short-day variety Clark, under bacterial influence, the value of RGR and NAR decreased. Additionally, LAR and SLA values indicated a reduction in the total photosynthetic surface area and leaf dry matter. Bacterial inoculation did not significantly affect the content of photosynthetic pigments in Clark leaves. Another short-day line, L80-5879, showed no significant impact of bacterial inoculation on biomass accumulation. However, soybean interaction with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b led to a decrease in leaf surface area and dry matter content. Probably, bacterial inoculation supported assimilation processes by increasing auxiliary chlorophyll b in photosystem I. A general trend of significant RGR reduction in neutral-day soybean lines, L63-3117 and L71-920, was identified under bacterial influence. The interaction with rhizobia differently affected LAR and SLA values, indicating distinct adaptive mechanisms to the interactions. In conditions of almost zero plant biomass accumulation, Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b caused a decrease in the total photosynthetic surface area and chlorophyll a and b content in the L63-3117 line. In L71-920, bacterial inoculation had no effect on the total photosynthetic surface area, while leaf dry matter and photosynthetic pigment content decreased. The obtained results demonstrate that interaction with rhizobia can influence the functioning of the assimilation apparatus in soybeans with varying photoperiod sensitivity that is determined by genotype. It is important in improving soybean productivity and its application in agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation decreased RGR and NAR of the short-day soybean variety Clark.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Clarke2
Treatment
treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634be1
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
RGR and NARe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the short-day variety Clark, under bacterial influence, the value of RGR and NAR decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation decreased total photosynthetic surface area and leaf dry matter in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634be1
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
total photosynthetic surface area and leaf dry mattere3
Direction
reductione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e3

“Additionally, LAR and SLA values indicated a reduction in the total photosynthetic surface area and leaf dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change photosynthetic pigment content in Clark leaves.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Clarke4
Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione4
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigmentse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bacterial inoculation did not significantly affect the content of photosynthetic pigments in Clark leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change biomass accumulation of the short-day line L80-5879.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
L80-5879e5
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione5
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
biomass accumulatione5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e5

“Another short-day line, L80-5879, showed no significant impact of bacterial inoculation on biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1635 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation probably supported assimilation processes by increasing auxiliary chlorophyll b in photosystem I of soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione6
Outcome
assimilation processese6
Qualifier
by increasing auxiliary chlorophyll b in photosystem Ie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e6

“Probably, bacterial inoculation supported assimilation processes by increasing auxiliary chlorophyll b in photosystem I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial influence significantly reduced RGR in the neutral-day soybean line L63-3117.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe7
Material
L63-3117e7
Treatment
bacterial influencee7
Outcome
RGRe7
Direction
reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A general trend of significant RGR reduction in neutral-day soybean lines, L63-3117 and L71-920, was identified under bacterial influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial influence significantly reduced RGR in the neutral-day soybean line L71-920.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe7
Material
L71-920e7
Treatment
bacterial influencee7
Outcome
RGRe7
Direction
reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A general trend of significant RGR reduction in neutral-day soybean lines, L63-3117 and L71-920, was identified under bacterial influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b decreased total photosynthetic surface area and chlorophyll a and b content in soybean line L63-3117 under almost zero plant biomass accumulation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
L63-3117e2
Treatment
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634be2
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume2symbiont
Outcome
total photosynthetic surface area and chlorophyll a and b contente2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
almost zero plant biomass accumulatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“In conditions of almost zero plant biomass accumulation, Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b caused a decrease in the total photosynthetic surface area and chlorophyll a and b content in the L63-3117 line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2156–2354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean line L71-920 bacterial inoculation had no effect on total photosynthetic surface area.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
L71-920e2
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione2
Outcome
total photosynthetic surface areae2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“In L71-920, bacterial inoculation had no effect on the total photosynthetic surface area, while leaf dry matter and photosynthetic pigment content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2356–2512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean line L71-920 bacterial inoculation decreased leaf dry matter and photosynthetic pigment content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
L71-920e2
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione2
Outcome
leaf dry matter and photosynthetic pigment contente2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“In L71-920, bacterial inoculation had no effect on the total photosynthetic surface area, while leaf dry matter and photosynthetic pigment content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2356–2512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction with rhizobia affected LAR and SLA values differently across soybean lines.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
interaction with rhizobiae2
Outcome
LAR and SLA valuese2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The interaction with rhizobia differently affected LAR and SLA values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2024–2093 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relation of RGR to NAR shows similar trends in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
RGRe2
Comparator
NARe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“RGR, which characterizes the biomass accumulation rate, has similar trends to those observed with NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1086 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of rhizobia on assimilation apparatus functioning and biomass accumulation depends on the soybean line genotype.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
soybean line genotypee2
Treatment
rhizobiae2
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634bBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
functioning of the assimilation apparatus and biomass accumulatione2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study investigated the impact of the interaction between soybean and rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental group for each line was treated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum 634b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results demonstrate that the influence of rhizobia on the functioning of the assimilation apparatus and biomass accumulation depends on the soybean line genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–969 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium japonicum · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Bradyrhizobium japonicum · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Bradyrhizobium japonicum · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

86 papers: 64 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.