Abstract
The effect of tomato seedling treated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains viz. Azotobacter sp. (AZM1),Bacillus cereus (BCM8), B. megaterium (BMM5) individually or combined with humic acid were evaluated for controlling wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, plant growth, fruit quantitative and qualitative (cv. Super Strain-B) during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 growing seasons. Under greenhouse conditions, all treatments significantly reduced area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of survival plants growing in pots infested with the causal pathogen compared with control. Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR reduced significantly wilt incidence and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of tomato plants comparing with the application of each of them alone. Under laboratory conditions, all PGPR strains and humic acid able to inhibited leaner growth of the causal pathogen with different degrees and PGPR strains were more active than humic acid in this respect. Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons. Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR strains increase the effectiveness of them in this respect more than used alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments reduced Fusarium wilt disease progress in greenhouse tomato.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen - Outcome
- area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under greenhouse conditions, all treatments significantly reduced area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of survival plants growing in pots infested with the causal pathogen compared with control.”
e1“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments increased height and fresh and dry weight of surviving greenhouse tomato plants.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
- Outcome
- plant height, fresh and dry weightse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under greenhouse conditions, all treatments significantly reduced area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of survival plants growing in pots infested with the causal pathogen compared with control.”
e1“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined humic acid and PGPR reduced wilt incidence relative to individual applications.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPRe0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- the application of each of them alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR reduced significantly wilt incidence and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of tomato plants comparing with the application of each of them alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined humic acid and PGPR increased tomato height and fresh and dry weights relative to individual applications.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPRe0
- Outcome
- plant height, fresh and dry weightse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- the application of each of them alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR reduced significantly wilt incidence and increased plant height, fresh and dry weights of tomato plants comparing with the application of each of them alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR strains and humic acid inhibited laboratory growth of the causal pathogen, with PGPR more active.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- all PGPR strains and humic acide0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
- Outcome
- leaner growth of the causal pathogene0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Comparator
- humic acide0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under laboratory conditions, all PGPR strains and humic acid able to inhibited leaner growth of the causal pathogen with different degrees and PGPR strains were more active than humic acid in this respect.”
e1“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments reduced tomato wilt disease progress against untreated plants.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments improved tomato height and branch number.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of branches plant -1e0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments improved tomato fruit number and weight traits.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weighte0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments improved tomato fruit yield and fruits per kilogram.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1e0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments improved tomato fruit color, dimensions, and firmness.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmnesse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field PGPR treatments improved tomato fruit height and soluble solids.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acide0
- Outcome
- fruit height, total soluble solidse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- untreated plants (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under field conditions, all PGPR stains individually or combined with humic acid significantly reduced AUDPC and improved plant growth (plant height, number of branches plant -1) quantitative (number of fruits plant -1, fruit weight plant -1, fruit weight, fruit yield fed. -1, Number of fruit Kg -1) and qualitative (degree of fruit’s color, fruit diameters, firmness, fruit height, total soluble solids) parameters of tomato fruits compared with untreated plants (control) in both growing seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining humic acid with PGPR increased field effectiveness compared with individual applications.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR strainse0
- Outcome
- effectivenesse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- used alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combination treatments of humic acid with PGPR strains increase the effectiveness of them in this respect more than used alone.”
t0“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
other · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →inoculation · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →other · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
171 papers more in this group
See all 175 papers →inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
197 papers more in this group
See all 201 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.