Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Effects of Soil Amendment on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia Solanacerum and Tomato Yields in Ethiopia

Getachew Ayana; Chemeda Fininsa; Seid Ahmed; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Ethiopia to evaluate the effect of silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse on tomato bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). Silicon fertilizer significantly reduced the bacterial population, mean wilt incidence, percent severity index, and corresponding areas of disease incidence, and severity progress curves in the moderately resistant tomato cultivar (King Kong 2). Similarly, sugarcane bagasse resulted in a significant reduction of mean wilt and percent severity index, the corresponding areas under disease incidence and severity progress curves and the bacterial population at 5 days post inoculation, compared to the control, in cultivar King Kong 2. However, neither silicon fertilizer nor sugarcane bagasse resulted in any significant reduction of all disease parameters in the moderately susceptible cultivar Marglobe. Silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse amendments also increased fruit yield for cultivar King Kong 2, but not for cultivar Marglobe. The total silicon content was also significantly increased in silicon fertilizer amendment, followed by sugarcane bagasse amended plants. The study recommends use of silicon fertilizer as a soil amendment under field conditions to augment resistance in moderately resistant cultivars where bacterial wilt disease problems prevail. However, a silicon fertilizer or silicon source was not found to substantiate or improve a susceptible cultivar. Sugarcane bagasse was demonstrated to possess a potential as an alternative soil amendment material and as an alternative silicon source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer significantly reduced bacterial population and wilt disease measures in King Kong 2.

Material
King Kong 2e0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Interactor
bacteriale0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial population, mean wilt incidence, percent severity indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilizer significantly reduced the bacterial population, mean wilt incidence, percent severity index, and corresponding areas of disease incidence, and severity progress curves in the moderately resistant tomato cultivar (King Kong 2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane bagasse significantly reduced wilt measures and bacterial population in King Kong 2 compared with control.

Material
King Kong 2e0
Treatment
sugarcane bagassee0
Outcome
mean wilt and percent severity indexe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
5 days post inoculatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane bagasse resulted in a significant reduction of mean wilt and percent severity index, the corresponding areas under disease incidence and severity progress curves and the bacterial population at 5 days post inoculation, compared to the control, in cultivar King Kong 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither amendment significantly reduced disease parameters in Marglobe.

Material
Marglobee0
Treatment
silicon fertilizer nor sugarcane bagassee0
Outcome
all disease parameterse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither silicon fertilizer nor sugarcane bagasse resulted in any significant reduction of all disease parameters in the moderately susceptible cultivar Marglobe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased fruit yield in King Kong 2.

Material
King Kong 2e0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse amendments also increased fruit yield for cultivar King Kong 2, but not for cultivar Marglobe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane bagasse increased fruit yield in King Kong 2.

Material
King Kong 2e0
Treatment
sugarcane bagassee0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse amendments also increased fruit yield for cultivar King Kong 2, but not for cultivar Marglobe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither amendment increased fruit yield in Marglobe.

Material
Marglobee0
Treatment
Silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse amendmentse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilizer and sugarcane bagasse amendments also increased fruit yield for cultivar King Kong 2, but not for cultivar Marglobe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer significantly increased total silicon content.

Treatment
silicon fertilizer amendmente0
Outcome
total silicon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total silicon content was also significantly increased in silicon fertilizer amendment, followed by sugarcane bagasse amended plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend silicon fertilizer to augment resistance in moderately resistant cultivars under field conditions.

Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
augment resistance in moderately resistant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study recommends use of silicon fertilizer as a soil amendment under field conditions to augment resistance in moderately resistant cultivars where bacterial wilt disease problems prevail.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify sugarcane bagasse as a potential alternative soil amendment and silicon source.

Outcome
alternative soil amendment material and as an alternative silicon sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane bagasse was demonstrated to possess a potential as an alternative soil amendment material and as an alternative silicon source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

silicon atom · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

130 papers: 117 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 117 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.