Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Some Isolates of Pseudomonas Vaccination on Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Tomato Under Field Condition

P sh Alipour; S Bolandnazar; MR Sarikhani; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Identifying of plant growth promoting bacteria and utilizing them is one of the basic stages in sustainable agriculture. In this experiment some newely isolated and identified strains of Pseudomonads, were used for the first time in inoculation of tomato in the field circumstances. Experiment was done based on randomized block design with 5 treatments and 3 replications. In this experiment tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Super Chief) seedlings were inoculated with integrated treatment of Pseudomonas ssp. strains including (S19-1+S10-3, S14-3+S19-1 and S19-1+S21-1), moreover, the control treatment without bacteria inoculation and fertilizer treatment (according to soil test) inorder to copmparison were considered. The result showed that the effects of bacteria on characters such as yeild, fruit size, vitamin C, lycopen, percentage of N, P, K in foliage of plant and leaf area index is meaningful and the best output is in S19-1+S14-3 (4830.9 g.m-2) and the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2. However the other measured traits in this experiment including number of fruits, acidity, TSS, pH, EC, firmness, diameter of stem, number of lateral shoot and chlorophyll index were not affectd by bacteria. According to this result we can mention the efficiency of used bacteria as a biofertilizer in improvement of yeild, nutrient uptake, LAI and fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S19-1+S14-3 bacterial mixture gave the best tomato yield, 4830.9 g.m-2.

Treatment
S19-1+S14-3e0
Outcome
outpute0
Direction
beste0
Value
4830.9 g.m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best output is in S19-1+S14-3 (4830.9 g.m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato vitamin C of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato lycopene of 46.01mg.kg-1.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46.01mg.kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato N of 30.09 mg.g-1.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.09 mg.g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato P of 7.30 mg.g-1.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.30 mg.g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato K of 15.60 mg.g-1.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.60 mg.g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S191-1+S21-1 treatment gave the highest tomato LAI of 6.60 cm2.

Treatment
S191-1+S21-1e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.60 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amount of vitamin C, lycopene, N, P, K, LAI was in S191-1+S21-1 treatment respectively and amounts of 7.02 mg.100g-1 Fwt, 46.01mg.kg-1, 30.09 mg.g-1, 7.30 mg.g-1, 15.60 mg.g-1, 6.60 cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not affect tomato fruit number, acidity and soluble solids.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
number of fruits, acidity, TSSe0
Direction
not affectde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruits, acidity, TSS, pH, EC, firmness, diameter of stem, number of lateral shoot and chlorophyll index were not affectd by bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not affect tomato pH, EC or firmness.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
pH, EC, firmnesse0
Direction
not affectde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruits, acidity, TSS, pH, EC, firmness, diameter of stem, number of lateral shoot and chlorophyll index were not affectd by bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not affect tomato stem diameter, lateral shoots or chlorophyll index.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
diameter of stem, number of lateral shoot and chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
not affectde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruits, acidity, TSS, pH, EC, firmness, diameter of stem, number of lateral shoot and chlorophyll index were not affectd by bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude these bacteria can be used as biofertilizer to improve tomato yield, nutrient uptake, leaf area and fruit quality.

Outcome
biofertilizer in improvement of yeild, nutrient uptake, LAI and fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficiency of used bacteria as a biofertilizer in improvement of yeild, nutrient uptake, LAI and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 58 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.