Paper · 1980 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Phosphorus and Sulphur Inter-relationships in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Abbas Marok; G. Dev

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot culture study was conducted in an arid brown loamy sand low in available P and S status. Phosphorus and S application increased dry matter yield and their interaction effect was positive and significant. With P application, P content and total uptake increased and tissue S concentration decreased. Sulphur application increased P and S contents and total S uptake. Applied P significantly raised the per cent utilization of applied S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizer. With increasing application of S, the uptake of fertilizer S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizer increased, and the per cent utilization of fertilizer S decreased. S:P ratio in plants was wider at lower levels of applied P and it narrowed down with increase in P application. The dry matter yield tended to decrease when S: P ratio was less than 0.25 and was considerably reduced when this ratio was more than 0.75.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and sulphur application increased wheat dry matter yield.

Treatment
Phosphorus and S applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and S application increased dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus-by-sulphur interaction on dry matter yield was positive and significant.

Treatment
Phosphorus and Sulphurt1
Outcome
interaction effecte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their interaction effect was positive and significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased wheat P content and total uptake.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
P content and total uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With P application, P content and total uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application decreased tissue S concentration.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
tissue S concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With P application, P content and total uptake increased and tissue S concentration decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application increased P and S contents and total S uptake.

Treatment
Sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
P and S contents and total S uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur application increased P and S contents and total S uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied P significantly increased utilization of applied S and the fraction of plant S from fertilizer.

Treatment
Applied Pe0
Outcome
per cent utilization of applied S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizere0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied P significantly raised the per cent utilization of applied S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing S application increased fertilizer S uptake and its fraction of plant S.

Treatment
increasing application of Se0
Outcome
uptake of fertilizer S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing application of S, the uptake of fertilizer S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizer increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing S application decreased percent utilization of fertilizer S.

Treatment
increasing application of Se0
Outcome
per cent utilization of fertilizer Se0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing application of S, the uptake of fertilizer S and fraction of S in plant derived from the applied fertilizer increased, and the per cent utilization of fertilizer S decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant S:P ratio narrowed as P application increased.

Treatment
increase in P applicatione0
Outcome
S:P ratio in plantse0
Direction
narrowed downe0
Comparator
lower levels of applied Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S:P ratio in plants was wider at lower levels of applied P and it narrowed down with increase in P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield tended to fall when the S:P ratio was below 0.25.

Compound
S: Pe0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
S: P ratio was less than 0.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter yield tended to decrease when S: P ratio was less than 0.25”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield was considerably reduced when the S:P ratio exceeded 0.75.

Compound
Sulphurt1
Outcome
considerably reducede0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
this ratio was more than 0.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was considerably reduced when this ratio was more than 0.75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Phosphorus and Sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.