Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Spacing and Biofertilizer on Growth and Yield of Greengram (Vigna radiata)

Shrishti Mahima Chandekar; Umesha C.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of spacing and biofertilizer on growth and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata)”, was conducted during the Kharif season of 2022 at the Crop Research Farm of the Department of Agronomy, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj. The experiment with nine treatments and three replications was laid down in factorial randomized block design. The results showed that pre harvest observations like plant height (42.04cm), dry weight (6.79 g), number of branches (6.18) of plant were higher in T3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm, Number of nodules per plant (6.62) was higher in treatment 2 i.e. Application of PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm and the value of the treatment. Post-harvest data indicated that the number of pods/plant (23.74), number of seeds/pod (7.72), test weight (41.30 g), seed yield (1.69 t/ha), biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm. The maximum cost of production and gross return was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm is INR. 36500/ha and INR. 88500/ha, respectively. The net return (INR. 12500/ha) and B:C Ratio (2:4) was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave the greatest plant height, 42.04cm.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.04cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (42.04cm), dry weight (6.79 g), number of branches (6.18) of plant were higher in T3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave dry weight of 6.79 g.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.79 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight (6.79 g), number of branches (6.18) of plant were higher in T3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave 6.18 branches per plant.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of branches (6.18) of plant were higher in T3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 2 gave the highest nodules per plant, 6.62.

Treatment
Application of PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
Number of nodules per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.62e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of nodules per plant (6.62) was higher in treatment 2 i.e. Application of PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave 23.74 pods per plant.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
number of pods/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.74e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods/plant (23.74), number of seeds/pod (7.72), test weight (41.30 g), seed yield (1.69 t/ha), biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave 7.72 seeds per pod.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
number of seeds/pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.72e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds/pod (7.72), test weight (41.30 g), seed yield (1.69 t/ha), biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave test weight of 41.30 g.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.30 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight (41.30 g), seed yield (1.69 t/ha), biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave seed yield of 1.69 t/ha.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.69 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (1.69 t/ha), biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave biological yield of 5.61 t/ha.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.61 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological yield (5.61 t/ha), stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave stover yield of 3.83 t/ha.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.83 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield (3.83 t/ha) and harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 gave harvest index of 33.37%.

Treatment
Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cme0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
33.37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (33.37%) were higher in treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 had the highest cost of production at INR. 36500/ha.

Outcome
cost of productione0
Value
INR. 36500/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum cost of production and gross return was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm is INR. 36500/ha and INR. 88500/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 had the highest gross return at INR. 88500/ha.

Outcome
gross returne0
Value
INR. 88500/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum cost of production and gross return was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm is INR. 36500/ha and INR. 88500/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 had the highest net return at INR. 12500/ha.

Outcome
net returne0
Value
INR. 12500/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net return (INR. 12500/ha) and B:C Ratio (2:4) was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 3 had the highest benefit to cost ratio, 2:4.

Outcome
B:C Ratioe0
Value
2:4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net return (INR. 12500/ha) and B:C Ratio (2:4) was recorded higher under treatment 3 i.e. Application of Rhizobium and PSB along with the spacing of 30x10 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Rhizobium · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

density · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

density · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.