Paper · 2011 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Allelopathic Effects of Four Chickpea Cultivars on Vegetative Growth of Sunflower and Corn under Controlled Conditions

k Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf; E Kazerooni Monfared; s Tokasi; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Abstract In order to study the effects of four chickpea cultivar (Cicer arietinum L.) on vegetative growth of sunflower (Helianthus annus) and corn (Zea mays), two separate experiments was conducted at Research Greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in 2005. Experiments were done in a factorial arrangement of treatments with two factors based on completely randomized design with 4 replications. Factors included chickpea cultivars (Karag12-60-31, Filip 84-482, Gam, ILC 482, and no residue control) and planting date of corn and sunflowers within root residues of chick pea (seeds planted simultaneously, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after harvesting of chickpea shoots). Seeds of corn and sunflower were planted within root residues of chickpea. Results showed that root residues of chickpea cultivars influenced height and shoot weight of sunflower significantly. The lowest sunflower height was obtained when they were planted within root residues of Flip and ILC cultivars, which decreased 13.7 and 11.1% relative to control, respectively. Planting date of sunflower within root residues of chick pea cultivars had a significant effect on sunflower leaf area, shoot weight, and its root/shoot ratio. So that, lowest leaf area, shoot weight, and also highest root/shoot ratio was obtained in third planting date. Results showed that lowest plant height, leaf area, root weight, shoot weight, and also highest root/shoot ratio of corn (6 weeks after planting) was obtained after planting within chickpea cultivars, Gam and ILC. Also the effect of corn planting date was significant. The lowest root and shoot weight, and root/shoot ratio of corn was obtained in the earliest corn planting date. Therefore, corn plants showed more sensitive than sunflower after planting within chickpea cultivars, and the highest inhibitory effects resulted in the earliest corn planting date. Keywords: Pea cultivars, Integrated management, Crop rotation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea root residues significantly influenced sunflower height and shoot weight.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
root residues of chickpea cultivarse0
Outcome
height and shoot weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root residues of chickpea cultivars influenced height and shoot weight of sunflower significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flip residues decreased sunflower height 13.7% relative to control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
root residues of Flipe0
Interactor
Flipe0weed
Outcome
sunflower heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.7e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest sunflower height was obtained when they were planted within root residues of Flip and ILC cultivars, which decreased 13.7 and 11.1% relative to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILC residues decreased sunflower height 11.1% relative to control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
root residues of Flip and ILC cultivarse0
Outcome
sunflower heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest sunflower height was obtained when they were planted within root residues of Flip and ILC cultivars, which decreased 13.7 and 11.1% relative to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date in chickpea residues significantly affected sunflower leaf area, shoot weight and root/shoot ratio.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Planting datee0
Outcome
sunflower leaf area, shoot weight, and its root/shoot ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting date of sunflower within root residues of chick pea cultivars had a significant effect on sunflower leaf area, shoot weight, and its root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third planting date gave the lowest sunflower leaf area and shoot weight.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
third planting datee0
Outcome
leaf area, shoot weighte0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest leaf area, shoot weight, and also highest root/shoot ratio was obtained in third planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third planting date gave the highest sunflower root/shoot ratio.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
third planting datee0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest leaf area, shoot weight, and also highest root/shoot ratio was obtained in third planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gam and ILC residues gave the lowest corn height, leaf area, root weight and shoot weight.

Treatment
chickpea cultivars, Gam and ILCe0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, root weight, shoot weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
6 weeks after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest plant height, leaf area, root weight, shoot weight, and also highest root/shoot ratio of corn (6 weeks after planting) was obtained after planting within chickpea cultivars, Gam and ILC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gam and ILC residues gave the highest corn root/shoot ratio.

Treatment
chickpea cultivars, Gam and ILCe0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest root/shoot ratio of corn (6 weeks after planting) was obtained after planting within chickpea cultivars, Gam and ILC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn planting date had a significant effect.

Treatment
planting datee0
Outcome
effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of corn planting date was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earliest corn planting date gave the lowest root weight, shoot weight and root/shoot ratio.

Treatment
earliest corn planting datee0
Outcome
root and shoot weight, and root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest root and shoot weight, and root/shoot ratio of corn was obtained in the earliest corn planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn was more sensitive than sunflower to chickpea residues.

Treatment
chickpea cultivarse0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Comparator
sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn plants showed more sensitive than sunflower after planting within chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earliest corn planting date produced the highest inhibitory effects.

Treatment
earliest corn planting datee0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest inhibitory effects resulted in the earliest corn planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–90 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

Cicer arietinum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

sowing time · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 38 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.