Paper · 2018 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

SOWING DATE AND IRRIGATION EFFECTS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN SUNFLOWER

M. Shahin; M. El-Bially; H. Saudy; et al.

18
claims
54
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Abiotic stresses represent a major impediment to crop productivity, especially in arid regions. Thus, over two years of 2014 and 2015, a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt to assess the productivity and water use efficiency (WUE) of sunflower as affected by planting dates (April 21, May 21, and June 21) and irrigation levels (ET100%, ET85% and ET70%,). Results clarified that leaf chlorophyll a content was higher by sowing in May than in either April or June sowings, while leaf carotenoides of plant sown in May or June surpassed those sown in April. The minimal value of proline was obtained with sowing in May. Sowing in May increased plant height by 52.2 and 22.3 as well as LAI by 19.3 and 73.1% than sowing in April and June, respectively. The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing. ET100% showed superiority over than ET85% and ET70% in improving sunflower yields and its attributes, but WUE did not affect. Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100% gave the maximum values of seed yield and its attributes and WUE surpassing other interaction treatments. In June, WUE value increased under severe water deficit i.e. ET70% comparing to moderately water–stressed (ET85%) or well–watered conditions (ET100%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll a content of sunflower was higher with May sowing than with April or June sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
sowing in Maye1
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll a contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
April or June sowingse1
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf chlorophyll a content was higher by sowing in May than in either April or June sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf carotenoids of sunflower sown in May or June surpassed those sown in April.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
plant sown in May or Junee2
Outcome
leaf carotenoidese2
Direction
surpassede2
Comparator
those sown in Aprile2
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf carotenoides of plant sown in May or June surpassed those sown in April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline of sunflower reached its minimum value with May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
sowing in Maye3
Outcome
prolinee3
Direction
minimale3
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e3

“The minimal value of proline was obtained with sowing in May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May sowing increased sunflower plant height by 52.2 percent relative to April sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sowing in Maye4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
52.2e4
Qualifier
Aprile4
Comparator
sowing in Aprile4
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sowing in May increased plant height by 52.2 and 22.3 as well as LAI by 19.3 and 73.1% than sowing in April and June, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May sowing increased sunflower plant height by 22.3 relative to June sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sowing in Maye4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
22.3e4
Qualifier
Junee4
Comparator
sowing in April and Junee4
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sowing in May increased plant height by 52.2 and 22.3 as well as LAI by 19.3 and 73.1% than sowing in April and June, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May sowing increased sunflower LAI by 19.3 relative to April sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sowing in Maye4
Outcome
LAIe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
19.3e4
Qualifier
Aprile4
Comparator
sowing in Aprile4
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sowing in May increased plant height by 52.2 and 22.3 as well as LAI by 19.3 and 73.1% than sowing in April and June, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May sowing increased sunflower LAI by 73.1 percent relative to June sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sowing in Maye4
Outcome
LAIe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
73.1%e4
Qualifier
Junee4
Comparator
sowing in April and Junee4
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sowing in May increased plant height by 52.2 and 22.3 as well as LAI by 19.3 and 73.1% than sowing in April and June, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April sowing reduced sunflower seed yield by 10.5 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
April and June sowingse5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
10.5e5
Qualifier
Aprile5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June sowing reduced sunflower seed yield by 12.8 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
June sowingse5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
12.8e5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April sowing reduced sunflower oil yield by 13.7 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
April and June sowingse5
Outcome
oil yielde5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
13.7e5
Qualifier
Aprile5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June sowing reduced sunflower oil yield by 18.3 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
June sowingse5
Outcome
oil yielde5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
18.3e5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April sowing reduced sunflower WUE by 11.8 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
April and June sowingse5
Outcome
WUEe5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
11.8e5
Qualifier
Aprile5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

June sowing reduced sunflower WUE by 9.8 percent relative to May sowing.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
June sowingse5
Outcome
WUEe5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
9.8e5
Comparator
May sowinge5
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reductions in seed yield, oil yield and WUE amounted to 10.5 and 12.8, 13.7 and 18.3 as well as 11.8 and 9.8 % with April and June sowings, respectively, compared to May sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ET100% irrigation was superior to ET85% and ET70% in improving sunflower yields and yield attributes.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ET100%e6
Outcome
yields and its attributese6
Direction
superioritye6
Comparator
ET85% and ET70%e6
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e6

“ET100% showed superiority over than ET85% and ET70% in improving sunflower yields and its attributes, but WUE did not affect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation level did not affect sunflower WUE.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ET100%e6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
did not affecte6
Comparator
ET85% and ET70%e6
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e6

“ET100% showed superiority over than ET85% and ET70% in improving sunflower yields and its attributes, but WUE did not affect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100% gave the maximum seed yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100%e7
Outcome
seed yield and its attributese7
Direction
maximum valuese7
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e7

“Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100% gave the maximum values of seed yield and its attributes and WUE surpassing other interaction treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100% surpassed other interaction treatments in WUE.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100%e7
Outcome
WUEe7
Direction
surpassinge7
Comparator
other interaction treatmentse7
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e7

“Sunflower sown in May and irrigated with ET100% gave the maximum values of seed yield and its attributes and WUE surpassing other interaction treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In June, WUE increased under severe water deficit (ET70%) compared with ET85% or ET100%.

Taxon
SUNFLOWERHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
severe water deficit i.e. ET70%e7
Outcome
WUE valuee7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
moderately water–stressed (ET85%) or well–watered conditions (ET100%)e7
Setting
El Nubaria region, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN SUNFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was undertaken at El Nubaria region, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
e7

“In June, WUE value increased under severe water deficit i.e. ET70% comparing to moderately water–stressed (ET85%) or well–watered conditions (ET100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1385 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

29 papers: 8 positive, 21 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

sowing time · physiology: pigments · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

sowing time · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Planting dates did not differ significantly in grain yield.

    Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of sunflower(Helianthus annus L.) · 2013 · compared with 20 May, 5 and 20 June

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 123 positive, 42 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

sowing time · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.