Paper · 2023 · Scientific Reports

Impact of different sowing dates and irrigation levels on NPK absorption, yield and water use efficiency of maize

Ahmed S. D. Abaza; Ayman M. S. Elshamly; Mona S. Alwahibi; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Upper Egypt experiences high temperatures during summer and low temperatures during winter, which significantly impacts the sowing dates of maize in this region. The productivity of maize crops and water use efficiency can be greatly affected by water stress and sowing dates (SDs). Therefore, it is crucial to determine the optimal irrigation level and SDs based on local conditions. To assess the effects, two irrigation levels were employed: (1) control (full irrigation water applied) and (2) 70% of irrigation water. Field experiments were conducted at the National Water Research Center's water studies and research complex station in Toshka. The aim was to evaluate two irrigation levels (full and limited irrigation) across five SDs (early: mid-February and March, normal: mid-June, and late: mid-August and September) in both 2019 and 2020, in order to identify the ideal sowing date (SD) and irrigation level. The normal SD resulted in an increased the growth season length between plant emergence and maturity. Conversely, the late SD reduced the number of days until plant maturity, resulting in higher grain yields and water use efficiency (WUE). Notably, the SD in September, coupled with the 70% irrigation level, yielded the highest productivity and WUE, with a productivity of 7014 kg ha −1 and a WUE of 0. 9 kg m −3 . Based on the findings, it is recommended that regions with similar conditions consider cultivating maize seeds in September, adopting a 70% irrigation level, to achieve optimal N uptake, growth traits (plant height, ear length, ear weight, number of rows per ear, and grain index weight), yield, and WUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal sowing increased the period from emergence to maturity.

Treatment
normal SDe0
Outcome
growth season length between plant emergence and maturitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The normal SD resulted in an increased the growth season length between plant emergence and maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing shortened time to maturity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late SDe0
Outcome
number of days until plant maturitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late SD reduced the number of days until plant maturity, resulting in higher grain yields and water use efficiency (WUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased grain yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late SDe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late SD reduced the number of days until plant maturity, resulting in higher grain yields and water use efficiency (WUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased water use efficiency (WUE).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late SDe0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late SD reduced the number of days until plant maturity, resulting in higher grain yields and water use efficiency (WUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

September sowing with 70% irrigation gave the highest productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SD in September, coupled with the 70% irrigation levele0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7014 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the SD in September, coupled with the 70% irrigation level, yielded the highest productivity and WUE, with a productivity of 7014 kg ha −1 and a WUE of 0. 9 kg m −3 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

September sowing with 70% irrigation gave the highest WUE.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SD in September, coupled with the 70% irrigation levele0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0. 9 kg m −3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the SD in September, coupled with the 70% irrigation level, yielded the highest productivity and WUE, with a productivity of 7014 kg ha −1 and a WUE of 0. 9 kg m −3 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend September sowing with 70% irrigation in similar regions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
cultivating maize seeds in September, adopting a 70% irrigation levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that regions with similar conditions consider cultivating maize seeds in September, adopting a 70% irrigation level, to achieve optimal N uptake, growth traits (plant height, ear length, ear weight, number of rows per ear, and grain index weight), yield, and WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1649 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 38 positive, 27 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

324 papers: 284 positive, 40 negative or no effect

283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

320 papers more in this group

See all 324 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.