Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production

Allelophatic Effects of Cicer arietinum L. Cultivars Straw on Seedling Growth of Helianthus annus L. and Zea mays L.

Elham Saeedi Pooya; S. Tokasi; Ebrahim Kazerooni Monfared

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Where crop residues are left on the soil surface to avoid soil erosion, preserve moisture, increase nutrient balance and a number of other benefits. The residues of preceding crops affect the germination of other crops through the release of allelochemicals. Thus, we investigated the allelopathic effects of straw aqueous extract of four chickpea cultivars on germination and seedling growth of corn and sunflower. Two separate experiments were conducted as the factorial experiments based on completely randomized design with extract of four chickpea cultivars (Karaj‚ Jam‚ Flip and Ilc480) and concentrations at (0, 5‚ 10‚ 20 and 40 %) with 3 replicates. Results indicated that, the degree of inhibition was largely dependent on the concentration of the extracts. Corn was more sensitive to different levels of extracts than Sunflower. Chickpea cultivars extracts had not significant difference on sunflower but showed significant inhibition in the case of Corn. The interaction effect had no significant effect in both crop plants. In general, there was a considerable response by sunflower and corn seeds to extract of chickpea cultivars that show chickpea straw not only had negative effect on seed germination, but also vegetative growth was relatively more sensitive to allelochemicals than germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar straw extracts significantly inhibited corn seedling growth.

Treatment
Chickpea cultivars extractse1
Outcome
seedling growtht0
Direction
significant inhibitione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea cultivars extracts had not significant difference on sunflower but showed significant inhibition in the case of Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedling Growth of Helianthus annus L. and Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivar straw extracts had no significant effect on sunflower seedling growth.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Chickpea cultivars extractse1
Outcome
seedling growtht0
Direction
not significant differencee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Chickpea cultivars extracts had not significant difference on sunflower but showed significant inhibition in the case of Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Seedling Growth of Helianthus annus L. and Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction effect of chickpea cultivar and concentration had no significant effect on the two crop plants.

Taxon
crop plantse2
Outcome
interaction effecte2

Verbatim

e2

“The interaction effect had no significant effect in both crop plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1034 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of inhibition depended largely on the concentration of the chickpea extracts.

Taxon
crop plantse2
Treatment
concentration of the extractse3
Outcome
degree of inhibitione3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e2

“The interaction effect had no significant effect in both crop plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1034 · show in text ↑
e3

“the degree of inhibition was largely dependent on the concentration of the extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn was more sensitive than sunflower to different levels of chickpea extracts.

Treatment
different levels of extractse4
Outcome
sensitivee4
Direction
more sensitivee4
Comparator
Sunflowere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Corn was more sensitive to different levels of extracts than Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea straw had a negative effect on seed germination of sunflower and corn.

Taxon
sunflower and corn seedsHelianthus annuusZea mays subsp. mayse5
Treatment
chickpea strawe6
Outcome
seed germinatione6
Direction
negative effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“there was a considerable response by sunflower and corn seeds to extract of chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1142 · show in text ↑
e6

“chickpea straw not only had negative effect on seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative growth of sunflower and corn was more sensitive to allelochemicals than germination.

Taxon
sunflower and corn seedsHelianthus annuusZea mays subsp. mayse5
Treatment
allelochemicalse7
Outcome
vegetative growthe7
Direction
more sensitivee7
Comparator
germinatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“there was a considerable response by sunflower and corn seeds to extract of chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1142 · show in text ↑
e7

“vegetative growth was relatively more sensitive to allelochemicals than germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1310 · show in text ↑

Cicer arietinum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

allelopathy · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

allelopathy · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 36 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.