Paper · 2012 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Germination Tests for Assessing Biochar Quality

N. Rogovska; D. Laird; R. M. Cruse; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
199
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Definition, analysis, and certification of biochar quality are crucial to the agronomic acceptance of biochar. While most biochars have a positive impact on plant growth, some may have adverse effects due to the presence of phytotoxic compounds. Conversely, some biochars may have the ability to adsorb and neutralize natural phytotoxic compounds found in soil. We evaluated the effects of biochars on seedling growth and absorption of allelochemicals present in corn ( L.) residues. Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars produced from varied feedstocks, thermochemical processes, and temperatures. Percent germination and shoot and radicle lengths were evaluated at the end of the germination period. Extracts from the six biochars had no effect on percent germination; however, extracts from three biochars produced at high conversion temperatures significantly inhibited shoot growth by an average of 16% relative to deionized (DI) water. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons detected in the aqueous extracts are believed to be at least partly responsible for the reduction in seedling growth. Repeated leaching of biochars before extract preparation eliminated the negative effects on seedling growth. Biochars differ significantly in their capacity to adsorb allelochemicals present in corn residues. Germination of corn seeds in extracts of corn residue showed 94% suppression of radicle growth compared to those exposed to DI water; however, incubation of corn residue extracts with leached biochar for 24 h before initiating the germination test increased radicle length 6 to 12 times compared to the corn residue extract treatments. Germination tests appear to be a reliable procedure to differentiate between effects of different types of biochar on corn seedling growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six biochar extracts did not change corn seed germination percentage.

Treatment
Extracts from the six biocharse0
Outcome
percent germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts from the six biochars had no effect on percent germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts from three high-temperature biochars inhibited corn shoot growth by an average 16% relative to deionized water.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
extracts from three biochars produced at high conversion temperaturese0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
deionized (DI) watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extracts from three biochars produced at high conversion temperatures significantly inhibited shoot growth by an average of 16% relative to deionized (DI) water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–546 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons may partly explain reduced corn seedling growth.

Compound
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonse0
Outcome
reduction in seedling growthe0
Qualifier
at least partlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons detected in the aqueous extracts are believed to be at least partly responsible for the reduction in seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated leaching of biochar eliminated adverse effects on corn seedling growth.

Treatment
Repeated leaching of biochars before extract preparatione0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Repeated leaching of biochars before extract preparation eliminated the negative effects on seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochars differed significantly in capacity to adsorb allelochemicals from corn residues.

Outcome
capacity to adsorb allelochemicalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochars differ significantly in their capacity to adsorb allelochemicals present in corn residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn residue extract suppressed corn radicle growth by 94% compared with deionized water.

Organ / stage
radiclee0
Treatment
extracts of corn residuee0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
94%e0
Comparator
DI watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of corn seeds in extracts of corn residue showed 94% suppression of radicle growth compared to those exposed to DI water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubating corn residue extract with leached biochar increased corn radicle length 6 to 12 times compared with residue extract alone.

Treatment
incubation of corn residue extracts with leached biochar for 24 he0
Outcome
radicle lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6 to 12 timese0
Comparator
corn residue extract treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incubation of corn residue extracts with leached biochar for 24 h before initiating the germination test increased radicle length 6 to 12 times compared to the corn residue extract treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1661 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seeds were germinated in aqueous extracts of six biochars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–546 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination tests differentiated biochar effects on corn seedling growth.

Outcome
differentiate between effects of different types of biochar on corn seedling growthe0
Comparator
different types of biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination tests appear to be a reliable procedure to differentiate between effects of different types of biochar on corn seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1801 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

biochar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

190 papers: 180 positive, 10 negative or no effect

179 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

186 papers more in this group

See all 190 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.