Paper · 2007

Effect of irrigation schedules, mulch and antitranspirant on growth, yield and economics of wheat (cv. DWD-I006)

B.A.D. Ranjita.; B.P. Janawade; Y. B. Palled

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to determine the effect of irrigation schedules, mulch and antiranspirant on growth, yield and economics of wheat. Irrigations scheduled at five critical growth stages viz., crown root initiation (CRI) + tillering + late jointing + flowering + milk stage resulted in significantly higher grain yield (2545 kg ha-1) over one, two and three irrigations but was on par with four irrigations scheduled at CRI + tillering + late jointing + milk stage. Increase in yield was due to higher number of effective tillers per metre row length, number of grains per ear and 1000 grain weight. Plant height, total dry matter production per metre row length were higher in frequently irrigated treatments. Grain yield was highest (2215 kg ha-1) in treatment receiving kaolin spray over control but was on par with straw mulch. Growth and yield attributing characters differed significantly due to the application of straw mulch and antitranspirant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-stage irrigation produced significantly higher wheat grain yield of 2545 kg ha-1 than one to three irrigations.

Material
cv. DWD-I006t0
Treatment
five critical growth stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2545 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
one, two and three irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigations scheduled at five critical growth stages viz., crown root initiation (CRI) + tillering + late jointing + flowering + milk stage resulted in significantly higher grain yield (2545 kg ha-1) over one, two and three irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-stage irrigation yielded similarly to four irrigations at the stated stages.

Treatment
five critical growth stagese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
four irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“was on par with four irrigations scheduled at CRI + tillering + late jointing + milk stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–571 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigations scheduled at five critical growth stages viz., crown root initiation (CRI) + tillering + late jointing + flowering + milk stage resulted in significantly higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–425 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher effective tiller number, grains per ear and 1000 grain weight explained the yield increase under irrigation.

Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
higher number of effective tillers per metre row length, number of grains per ear and 1000 grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increase in yield was due to higher number of effective tillers per metre row length, number of grains per ear and 1000 grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent irrigation increased wheat plant height and total dry matter production.

Treatment
frequently irrigated treatmentse0
Outcome
Plant height, total dry matter production per metre row lengthe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, total dry matter production per metre row length were higher in frequently irrigated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin spray produced the highest grain yield of 2215 kg ha-1 relative to control.

Treatment
kaolin spraye0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2215 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield was highest (2215 kg ha-1) in treatment receiving kaolin spray over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin spray grain yield was on par with straw mulch.

Treatment
kaolin spraye0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
straw mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield was highest (2215 kg ha-1) in treatment receiving kaolin spray over control but was on par with straw mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch significantly changed wheat growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
Growth and yield attributing characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth and yield attributing characters differed significantly due to the application of straw mulch and antitranspirant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antitranspirant significantly changed wheat growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
antitranspirante0
Outcome
Growth and yield attributing characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (cv. DWD-I006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth and yield attributing characters differed significantly due to the application of straw mulch and antitranspirant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1060 · show in text ↑

kaolin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.