Paper · 2026 · Food Control

Consortia of biocontrol agents provide improved control of apple postharvest diseases compared to monocultures

Ana María Sánchez; Jonàs Oliva; Carla Casals; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Postharvest diseases caused by fungal pathogens, such as Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea , are responsible for apple fruit losses during storage and commercialization. Biological control agents (BCAs) using antagonistic microorganisms are an alternative to traditional fungicides, providing effective results while ensuring environmental safety. This study tested whether a microbial consortium of two distinct strains from different climatic conditions is more effective and stable than single strains. The selected pairs of microorganisms were presumably adapted to different ecological niches and consisted of the bacterium Pantoea agglomerans strain B296 (BV), isolated from the Ebro Valley, and the yeast Vishniacozyma carnescens L157 strain (YM), from the Pyrenees Mountains in Catalonia (Spain). The postharvest biocontrol potential of the microbial candidates was evaluated in real postharvest conditions. Prior to that, an analysis of their population dynamics and the minimum effective dose were carried out, after which, a fluidised-bed spray-dried formulation was developed and applied individually and in consortia. Efficacy was assessed against P . expansum and B . cinerea on two apple varieties (‘Golden Reinders’ and ‘Mandy’) under different storage conditions. The efficacy results showed that the consortium of two BCAs at a concentration of 10 7 CFU mL -1 effectively controlled P. expansum and B. cinerea under certain room temperature and cold storage conditions better than when applied separately. Therefore, the novel water dispersible granules (WG formulations) of two microorganisms, formulated together in a consortium using the fluidised-bed spray drying system, demonstrated significantly improved survivability compared to the individual formulations. Our results showed the potential of microbial consortia as a sustainable biocontrol product, as they performed better under certain storage conditions compared to the individual isolates in postharvest disease control. The use of consortia instead of monocultures represents a step forward in postharvest disease management, offering a promising alternative to chemical fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium controlled P. expansum better than separately applied agents under certain storage conditions.

Treatment
consortium of two BCAs at a concentration of 10 7 CFU mL -1e0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
P. expansume0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
certain room temperature and cold storage conditionse0
Comparator
when applied separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy results showed that the consortium of two BCAs at a concentration of 10 7 CFU mL -1 effectively controlled P. expansum and B. cinerea under certain room temperature and cold storage conditions better than when applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium controlled B. cinerea better than separately applied agents under certain storage conditions.

Treatment
consortium of two BCAs at a concentration of 10 7 CFU mL -1e0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
B. cinereae0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
when applied separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy results showed that the consortium of two BCAs at a concentration of 10 7 CFU mL -1 effectively controlled P. expansum and B. cinerea under certain room temperature and cold storage conditions better than when applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium granules had significantly improved survivability compared with individual formulations.

Treatment
formulated together in a consortiume0
Outcome
survivabilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
individual formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the novel water dispersible granules (WG formulations) of two microorganisms, formulated together in a consortium using the fluidised-bed spray drying system, demonstrated significantly improved survivability compared to the individual formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Botrytis cinerea · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.