Paper · 2024 · Прикладная биохимия и микробиология

The biological efficiency of multifunctional complexes based on Bacillus subtilis strains and chitosan salicylate in wheat cultivation

I. I. Novikova; L. E. Kolesnikov; E. V. Popova; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of multifunctional complexes capable of causing a growth-stimulating effect on plants and inhibiting the development of a wide range of diseases on the Leningradka 6 spring soft wheat cultivar (k-64900) was investigated. In the research, it was found that the application of multifunctional complexes based on the Bacillus subtilis bacterial strains and 0.1% chitosan salicylate in wheat cultivation led to a significant decrease in the incidence of plant diseases: yellow and brown rust, powdery mildew, root rot and caused an increase in morphometric productivity indicators. This tendency was associated with a significant influence of multifunctional complexes on the increase in the number of primary and nodal roots; the length of nodal roots; productive bushiness; the number of spikelets per spike; the grains weight per spike. However, the effectiveness of protective and stimulating wheat treatments depended on the complex of natural and climatic factors of wheat vegetation seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis and chitosan salicylate complexes significantly decreased the incidence of yellow and brown rust, powdery mildew and root rot in wheat.

Material
Leningradka 6e0
Treatment
multifunctional complexes based on the Bacillus subtilis bacterial strains and 0.1% chitosan salicylatee1
Interactor
yellow and brown ruste1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of plant diseasese1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
powdery mildew, root rote1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Leningradka 6 spring soft wheat cultivar (k-64900)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of multifunctional complexes based on the Bacillus subtilis bacterial strains and 0.1% chitosan salicylate in wheat cultivation led to a significant decrease in the incidence of plant diseases: yellow and brown rust, powdery mildew, root rot and caused an increase in morphometric productivity indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same complexes increased morphometric productivity indicators of wheat.

Material
Leningradka 6e0
Treatment
multifunctional complexes based on the Bacillus subtilis bacterial strains and 0.1% chitosan salicylatee1
Outcome
morphometric productivity indicatorse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Leningradka 6 spring soft wheat cultivar (k-64900)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of multifunctional complexes based on the Bacillus subtilis bacterial strains and 0.1% chitosan salicylate in wheat cultivation led to a significant decrease in the incidence of plant diseases: yellow and brown rust, powdery mildew, root rot and caused an increase in morphometric productivity indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multifunctional complexes increased the number of primary and nodal roots, length of nodal roots and productive bushiness of wheat.

Treatment
multifunctional complexese2
Outcome
number of primary and nodal roots; the length of nodal roots; productive bushinesse2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e2

“This tendency was associated with a significant influence of multifunctional complexes on the increase in the number of primary and nodal roots; the length of nodal roots; productive bushiness; the number of spikelets per spike; the grains weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multifunctional complexes increased the number of spikelets per spike and grain weight per spike of wheat.

Treatment
multifunctional complexese2
Outcome
the number of spikelets per spike; the grains weight per spikee2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e2

“This tendency was associated with a significant influence of multifunctional complexes on the increase in the number of primary and nodal roots; the length of nodal roots; productive bushiness; the number of spikelets per spike; the grains weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–848 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effectiveness of protective and stimulating wheat treatments depended on natural and climatic factors of the vegetation season.

Treatment
protective and stimulating wheat treatmentse3
Outcome
effectiveness of protective and stimulating wheat treatmentse3
Setting
natural and climatic factors of wheat vegetation seasonse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the effectiveness of protective and stimulating wheat treatments depended on the complex of natural and climatic factors of wheat vegetation seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1007 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

salicylate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

chitosan · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.