Paper · 2006 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Biological control of Fusarium graminearum on wheat by antagonistic bacteria

Javad Nourozian; Hassan Reza Etebarian; Gholam Khodakaramian

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
99
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis strains 53 and 71, Pseudomonas fluorescens biov1 strain 32 and Streptomyces sp. Strain 3 were evaluated as potential biological agents for control of fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by Fusarium graminearum. Mycelial growth of the pathogen was reduced by cell free and volatile metabolites of bacterial antagonists by 37%-97%. Streptomyces sp. Strain 3 reduced disease severity of FHB 21 d after inoculation. The yield of wheat from plants treated with Streptomyces sp. strain 3 and F. graminearum was significantly greater than in controls inoculated with the pathogen alone. Treatments with Streptomyces sp. alone increased the yield of wheat compared to the uninoculated controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial antagonist metabolites reduced pathogen mycelial growth by 37%-97%.

Treatment
cell free and volatile metabolites of bacterial antagonistse0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
Mycelial growth of the pathogene0
Direction
reducede0
Value
37%-97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycelial growth of the pathogen was reduced by cell free and volatile metabolites of bacterial antagonists by 37%-97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces sp. Strain 3 reduced FHB severity after 21 days.

Treatment
Streptomyces sp. Strain 3e0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces sp. Strain 3Streptomyces sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severity of FHBe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
21 d after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces sp. Strain 3 reduced disease severity of FHB 21 d after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat treated with Streptomyces and pathogen yielded more than pathogen-only controls.

Treatment
Streptomyces sp. strain 3 and F. graminearume0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces sp. strain 3Streptomyces sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controls inoculated with the pathogen alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of wheat from plants treated with Streptomyces sp. strain 3 and F. graminearum was significantly greater than in controls inoculated with the pathogen alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces alone increased wheat yield relative to uninoculated controls.

Treatment
Streptomyces sp. alonee0
Interactor
Streptomyces sp.Streptomyces sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with Streptomyces sp. alone increased the yield of wheat compared to the uninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–701 · show in text ↑

metabolite · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Fusarium graminearum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Streptomyces · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Streptomyces · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.