Paper · 2025 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Seed and foliar treatments for control of barley diseases in a no-till system in a semi-arid region of Morocco

El Wazziki, Hanane; El yousfi, Brahim

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Barley diseases pose significant challenges in no-till agricultural systems. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining seed and foliar treatments for managing barley diseases within a no-till system in Morocco and to provide practical recommendations for sustainable management. Conducted over two cropping seasons on a no-till platform in a semi-arid region, the treatments included seed treatment with tebuconazole and foliar application with a systemic fungicide (Spiroxamine + Tebuconazole + Triadimenol). Disease severity was visually assessed at emergence, before treatment, and one-week post-foliar application. In the first season, seed treatment reduced seedling dry weight without affecting disease severity or plant density. Both seed and foliar treatments significantly reduced disease severity in adult plants, by 50% with foliar treatment and by 27% with seed treatment. However, seed treatment decreased grain yield while increasing thousand-grain weight (TGW). In the second season, neither seed nor foliar treatments significantly influenced dry biomass, grain yield, or TGW, though foliar treatment increased the number of empty ears. Combining seed and foliar treatments showed no additional benefits for disease control or yield in both seasons. The results indicate that foliar treatments are more effective than seed treatments for managing barley diseases, particularly in years with higher disease severity. However, in seasons with low disease pressure, disease treatments in no-till systems may not be economically viable for farmers. These findings suggest that integrated disease management strategies should consider climatic variability to optimize treatment efficacy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season seed treatment reduced seedling dry weight.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
seedling dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season, seed treatment reduced seedling dry weight without affecting disease severity or plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season seed treatment did not affect disease severity.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment reduced seedling dry weight without affecting disease severity or plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season seed treatment did not affect plant density.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
plant densitye0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment reduced seedling dry weight without affecting disease severity or plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment reduced adult-plant disease severity by 50% in season one.

Treatment
foliar treatmente0
Outcome
disease severity in adult plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both seed and foliar treatments significantly reduced disease severity in adult plants, by 50% with foliar treatment and by 27% with seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment reduced adult-plant disease severity by 27% in season one.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
disease severity in adult plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both seed and foliar treatments significantly reduced disease severity in adult plants, by 50% with foliar treatment and by 27% with seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment decreased grain yield in season one.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment decreased grain yield while increasing thousand-grain weight (TGW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment increased thousand-grain weight in season one.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
thousand-grain weight (TGW)e0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment decreased grain yield while increasing thousand-grain weight (TGW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In season two, seed treatment did not significantly influence dry biomass, grain yield or TGW.

Treatment
seede0
Outcome
dry biomass, grain yield, or TGWe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second season, neither seed nor foliar treatments significantly influenced dry biomass, grain yield, or TGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In season two, foliar treatment did not significantly influence dry biomass, grain yield or TGW.

Treatment
foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
dry biomass, grain yield, or TGWe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second season, neither seed nor foliar treatments significantly influenced dry biomass, grain yield, or TGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment increased empty ears in season two.

Treatment
foliar treatmente0
Outcome
number of empty earse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar treatment increased the number of empty ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining seed and foliar treatments added no disease-control benefit in either season.

Treatment
Combining seed and foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
no additional benefitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining seed and foliar treatments showed no additional benefits for disease control or yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining seed and foliar treatments added no yield benefit in either season.

Treatment
Combining seed and foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no additional benefitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining seed and foliar treatments showed no additional benefits for disease control or yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judge foliar treatment more effective than seed treatment for barley disease management, especially in high-severity years.

Outcome
managing barley diseasese0
Comparator
seed treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar treatments are more effective than seed treatments for managing barley diseases, particularly in years with higher disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judge disease treatments potentially uneconomic in low-pressure no-till seasons.

Outcome
disease treatments in no-till systems may not be economically viable for farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in seasons with low disease pressure, disease treatments in no-till systems may not be economically viable for farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend accounting for climatic variability in integrated disease management.

Outcome
integrated disease management strategies should consider climatic variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated disease management strategies should consider climatic variability to optimize treatment efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑

application · control · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 47 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

application · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.