Paper · 2000 · Journal of American Pomological Society

Gibberellic Acid Sprays Increase Berry Size andReduce Shot Berry of ‘Vanessa’ Grapevines

Thomas J. Zabadal; Thomas W. Dittmer

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

‘Vanessa,’ a red seedless table grape, is often recommended for planting in cool climates because berries have excellent color, crisp texture, and flavor. However, in its natural condition ‘Vanessa’ clusters tend to be loose with small berries and frequent shot berries. The application of gibberellic acid (GA) to correct these deficiencies was evaluated for four growing seasons at concentrations of 25 and 50 ppm when berry diameters averaged 3, 5, 7 and 9 mm. GA increased yield, cluster weight, berry weight, fruits soluble solids and juice pH and decreased the number of shot berries per cluster and cluster compactness. Applications of GA at 50 ppm when berries averaged 5 mm in diameter were most effective for increasing berry weight and fruit soluble solids while reducing the occurrence of shot berry. Cane pruning weights recorded for vines over the 4-year period indicate no reduction in vine size as a result of GA applications made directly to clusters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA increased grape yield, cluster weight and berry weight.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
yield, cluster weight, berry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA increased yield, cluster weight, berry weight, fruits soluble solids and juice pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA increased fruit soluble solids and juice pH.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
fruits soluble solids and juice pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA increased yield, cluster weight, berry weight, fruits soluble solids and juice pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA reduced shot berries per cluster and cluster compactness.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GAt1
Outcome
number of shot berries per cluster and cluster compactnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the number of shot berries per cluster and cluster compactness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA at 50 ppm applied when berries averaged 5 mm was most effective for increasing berry weight and soluble solids and reducing shot berries.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GA at 50 ppme0
Outcome
berry weight and fruit soluble solidse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
when berries averaged 5 mm in diametere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of GA at 50 ppm when berries averaged 5 mm in diameter were most effective for increasing berry weight and fruit soluble solids while reducing the occurrence of shot berry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct GA cluster sprays did not reduce vine size over four years.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GA applications made directly to clusterse0
Outcome
vine sizee0
Direction
no reductione0
Qualifier
4-year periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cane pruning weights recorded for vines over the 4-year period indicate no reduction in vine size as a result of GA applications made directly to clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · VitisResults differ

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

cluster · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.