Paper · 2001 · HortScience

Gibberellic Acid Applied at Bloom Reduces Fruit Set and Improves Size of 'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes

N.K. Dokoozlian; W.L. Peacock

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
92
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Excessive fruit set can reduce the quality of 'Crimson Seedless' table grapes ( Vitis vinifera L.), resulting in compact, tightly filled clusters with small berries that are prone to bunch rot at harvest. Two separate studies were conducted to examine the effects of application timing and rate on the efficacy of GA 3 for berry thinning. In the first experiment, vines were treated with 2 g·ha -1 GA 3 at one of the following stages of bloom: 1% to 5%; 20% to 30%; 50% to 60%; 80% to 90%; or 100% capfall (falling of the calyptra). The second experiment compared treatments of 0, 2.5, 6.25, 12.5, 18.75, or 25 g·ha -1 GA 3 applied at ≈80% bloom. Fruit set (number of berries/cm shoulder length) was similar among vines treated between 1% to 5% and 100% bloom with 2 g·ha -1 GA 3 , although berry set was reduced relative to the control. However, applications made during the later stages of bloom significantly increased berry length and weight. Fruit set generally declined, and the number of shot berries per cluster increased, as the amount of GA 3 applied at bloom increased. Applications ≥6.25 g·ha -1 GA 3 resulted in commercially unacceptable levels of shot berries, as well as significant reductions in cluster weight and packable yield per vine. The results indicate that a single application of 2.5 g·ha -1 GA 3 near full bloom may be used to reduce fruit set and increase berry size of this cultivar without detrimental effects on packable yield or cluster number per vine the subsequent year. Chemical name used: gibberellic acid (GA 3 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit set was similar among vines treated with 2 g/ha GA3 at any bloom stage from 1-5% to 100% bloom.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
2 g·ha -1 GA 3e0
Outcome
Fruit sete0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
vines treated between 1% to 5% and 100% bloome0

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit set (number of berries/cm shoulder length) was similar among vines treated between 1% to 5% and 100% bloom with 2 g·ha -1 GA 3 , although berry set was reduced relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry set was reduced by 2 g/ha GA3 applied at bloom relative to the control.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
2 g·ha -1 GA 3e0
Outcome
berry sete0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit set (number of berries/cm shoulder length) was similar among vines treated between 1% to 5% and 100% bloom with 2 g·ha -1 GA 3 , although berry set was reduced relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 applications made during the later stages of bloom significantly increased berry length and weight.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
applications made during the later stages of bloome0
Outcome
berry length and weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications made during the later stages of bloom significantly increased berry length and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit set generally declined as the amount of GA3 applied at bloom increased.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
amount of GA 3 applied at bloome0
Outcome
Fruit sete0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit set generally declined, and the number of shot berries per cluster increased, as the amount of GA 3 applied at bloom increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of shot berries per cluster increased as the amount of GA3 applied at bloom increased.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
amount of GA 3 applied at bloome0
Outcome
number of shot berries per clustere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit set generally declined, and the number of shot berries per cluster increased, as the amount of GA 3 applied at bloom increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of 6.25 g/ha GA3 or more resulted in commercially unacceptable levels of shot berries.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
Applications ≥6.25 g·ha -1 GA 3e0
Outcome
levels of shot berriese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Qualifier
commercially unacceptablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applications ≥6.25 g·ha -1 GA 3 resulted in commercially unacceptable levels of shot berries, as well as significant reductions in cluster weight and packable yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of 6.25 g/ha GA3 or more significantly reduced cluster weight and packable yield per vine.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
Applications ≥6.25 g·ha -1 GA 3e0
Outcome
cluster weight and packable yield per vinee0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applications ≥6.25 g·ha -1 GA 3 resulted in commercially unacceptable levels of shot berries, as well as significant reductions in cluster weight and packable yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that a single application of 2.5 g/ha GA3 near full bloom may be used to reduce fruit set and increase berry size without detrimental effects on packable yield or cluster number per vine the next year.

Taxon
Table Grapest0
Treatment
single application of 2.5 g·ha -1 GA 3 near full bloome0
Outcome
reduce fruit set and increase berry sizee0

Verbatim

t0

“'Crimson Seedless' Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“a single application of 2.5 g·ha -1 GA 3 near full bloom may be used to reduce fruit set and increase berry size of this cultivar without detrimental effects on packable yield or cluster number per vine the subsequent year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1504 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.