Paper · 1993 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Vine Water Stress and Peduncle Girdling Effects on Pre- and Post-Veraison Grape Berry Growth and Deformability

Glen L. Creasy; Porter B. Lombard

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To elucidate the effects of developmental xylem discontinuity in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries, greenhouse-grown Pinot noir vines bearing pre- or post-veraison clusters were subjected to water stress or peduncle girdling/ detaching. Berry growth rate (change in diameter per day) and deformability were measured as indicators of berry water status. Berry diameter increased slightly in pre-veraison clusters on well watered vines; diameters of berries on unwatered vines decreased significantly. Pre-veraison berry deformability was four times greater in unwatered versus watered vines on the final day of the experiment. Bagging pre-veraison clusters to slow transpiration had little effect on berry growth rate or deformability. Post-veraison berry growth rate and deformability were not affected significantly by vine water stress. Heat girdling cluster peduncles decreased pre-veraison berry growth rates by 75%, but had a negligible effect on berry deformability. Diameter loss in post-veraison berries was increased by 40% after girdling; berry deformability increased by 44%. The rate of berry diameter loss on a detached cluster was almost three times higher, and berry deformability 26% higher, than the same measurements taken from a girdled cluster. A xylem discontinuity in the berry near veraison is consistent with these findings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preveraison berry diameter rose slightly in well watered vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
pre-veraison clusterse0
Outcome
Berry diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Berry diameter increased slightly in pre-veraison clusters on well watered vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preveraison berry diameter declined significantly in unwatered vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
unwatered vinese0
Outcome
diameters of berriese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“diameters of berries on unwatered vines decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preveraison berry deformability was four times higher in unwatered than watered vines on the final day.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
unwaterede0
Outcome
berry deformabilitye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
four timese0
Comparator
watered vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison berry deformability was four times greater in unwatered versus watered vines on the final day of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging preveraison clusters had little effect on berry growth rate or deformability.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Bagging pre-veraison clusterse0
Outcome
berry growth rate or deformabilitye0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging pre-veraison clusters to slow transpiration had little effect on berry growth rate or deformability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postveraison berry growth rate and deformability were not significantly affected by vine water stress.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
vine water stresse0
Outcome
berry growth rate and deformabilitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Post-veraison berry growth rate and deformability were not affected significantly by vine water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peduncle heat girdling decreased preveraison berry growth rate by 75%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Heat girdling cluster pedunclese0
Outcome
pre-veraison berry growth ratese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Heat girdling cluster peduncles decreased pre-veraison berry growth rates by 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peduncle heat girdling had negligible effect on berry deformability.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
berry deformabilitye0
Direction
negligible effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but had a negligible effect on berry deformability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased postveraison berry diameter loss by 40%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
Diameter losse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Diameter loss in post-veraison berries was increased by 40% after girdling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased postveraison berry deformability by 44%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
berry deformabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“berry deformability increased by 44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detached clusters lost berry diameter almost three times faster than girdled clusters.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
detached clustere0
Outcome
rate of berry diameter losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
almost three timese0
Comparator
girdled clustere0

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of berry diameter loss on a detached cluster was almost three times higher, and berry deformability 26% higher, than the same measurements taken from a girdled cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detached cluster berry deformability was 26% higher than in girdled clusters.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
berry deformabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
girdled clustere0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“berry deformability 26% higher, than the same measurements taken from a girdled cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 · show in text ↑

cluster · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

trap barrier · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

heat · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 8 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

48 papers: 29 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.