Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Weed management in maize (Zea mays ) in western Indo-Gangetic Plains through tank-mix herbicide application

V S SUSHA; T K DAS; A R SHARMA

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

To evaluate the bio-efficacy of pre-emergence tank-mix and sequential application (pre-emergence followed by (fb) post-emergence) of herbicides on weeds particularly Cyperus rotundus L. in maize (Zea mays L.), a field experiment was conducted in 2010 and 2011 at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. It was observed that the tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ha with or without KNO3 (6%) and pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + chlorimuron-p- ethyl 0.006 kg/ha resulted in significant suppression of Cyperus rotundus, broad leaved and grassy weeds, and caused a significant reduction in total weed population and dry weight. These tank-mixes were superior to other weed control treatments and resulted in higher weed control efficiency and weed control index. However, the pre-emergence tank-mix application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ ha resulted in comparable maize yield with weed-free check in both years, but the yields in this treatment were higher than in other weed control treatments. This treatment, excluding weed-free check, resulted in the highest net returns and net benefit:cost. Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha + mustard residue mulch @ 5 tonnes/ha was the next best treatment, resulting in higher maize yield through concurrent reduction in weed competition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus imazethapyr, with or without KNO3, significantly suppressed Cyperus rotundus, broad-leaved and grassy weeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ha with or without KNO3 (6%)e0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Outcome
suppression of Cyperus rotundus, broad leaved and grassy weedse0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ha with or without KNO3 (6%) and pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + chlorimuron-p- ethyl 0.006 kg/ha resulted in significant suppression of Cyperus rotundus, broad leaved and grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus chlorimuron-p-ethyl significantly suppressed Cyperus rotundus and other weeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + chlorimuron-p- ethyl 0.006 kg/hae0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Outcome
suppression of Cyperus rotundus, broad leaved and grassy weedse0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + chlorimuron-p- ethyl 0.006 kg/ha resulted in significant suppression of Cyperus rotundus, broad leaved and grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mixes significantly reduced total weed population and dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tank-mixese0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed population and dry weighte1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These tank-mixes were superior to other weed control treatments and resulted in higher weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a significant reduction in total weed population and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mixes gave higher weed control efficiency and weed control index than other weed control treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tank-mixese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiency and weed control indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These tank-mixes were superior to other weed control treatments and resulted in higher weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus imazethapyr produced maize yield comparable to a weed-free check in both years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ hae0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
both yearse0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ ha resulted in comparable maize yield with weed-free check in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus imazethapyr gave higher maize yields than other weed control treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ hae1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yields in this treatment were higher than in other weed control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ ha resulted in comparable maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apart from the weed-free check, this treatment produced the highest net returns and net benefit:cost.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ hae1
Outcome
net returns and net benefit:coste0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment, excluding weed-free check, resulted in the highest net returns and net benefit:cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.050 kg/ ha resulted in comparable maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus mustard residue mulch was the next best treatment and gave higher maize yield with reduced weed competition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha + mustard residue mulch @ 5 tonnes/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha + mustard residue mulch @ 5 tonnes/ha was the next best treatment, resulting in higher maize yield through concurrent reduction in weed competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1346 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

    Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1 · 1973 · compared with conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment

    Opposite direction

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.