Paper · 2025 · European Journal of Plant Pathology

Effects of zinc oxide submicron particles and nanoparticles on the inhibition of Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria alternata

Jolanta Kowalska; Małgorzata Antkowiak; Joanna Krzymińska; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) exhibit antifungal properties and may be applied for limitation of pathogen growth in crop production. The objectives of the study were: 1) to investigate and compare the effects of ZnO submicron particles (ZnO SMPs) and ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) on the in vitro response of Botrytis cinerea , Fusarium oxysporum, and Alternaria alternata and 2) to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Bawole Serce’). In the in vitro experiment ZnO SMPs or ZnO NPs at the concentration of 0, 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/l were applied. In the in vivo experiment, potted tomato plants were infected with pathogens and sprayed with ZnO SMPs or ZnO NPs suspensions at the concentration of 500 mg/l. Experimental objects included also non-infected control plants, as well as infected and ZnO SMPs/NPs non-treated control plants. The addition of ZnO NPs and ZnO SMPs to the PDA medium significantly inhibited the growth of mycelium of all tested pathogens. However, the advantage of ZnO NPs over ZnO SMPs in inhibiting the growth of mycelium has not been demonstrated. Interestingly, the lowest tested ZnO SMPs/NPs concentration (100 mg/l) caused a significant reduction of mycelium growth of F. oxysporum and A. alternata (up to 33.32%). As for B. cinerea , only the concentration of 500 mg/l and higher concentrations of tested material samples limited the growth of its mycelium (up to 82.67%). In vivo experiment on tomato plants did not confirm the effectiveness of ZnO SMPs in the reduction of B. cinerea and A. alternata infection, in contrast to ZnO NPs, which significantly limited the growth of all pathogens (by between 56.99% and 65.11%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ZnO NPs and ZnO SMPs to PDA medium significantly inhibited mycelium growth of all tested tomato pathogens in vitro.

Treatment
addition of ZnO NPs and ZnO SMPs to the PDA mediume1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporumt0pathogen
Outcome
growth of myceliume1
Direction
inhibitede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–525 · show in text ↑
e1

“The addition of ZnO NPs and ZnO SMPs to the PDA medium significantly inhibited the growth of mycelium of all tested pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“on the in vitro response of Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of zinc oxide submicron particles and nanoparticles on the inhibition of Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria alternata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest tested ZnO SMPs/NPs concentration (100 mg/l) significantly reduced mycelium growth of F. oxysporum and A. alternata by up to 33.32%.

Treatment
the lowest tested ZnO SMPs/NPs concentration (100 mg/l)e3
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume3pathogen
Second interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae3pathogen
Outcome
mycelium growthe3
Direction
reductione3
Value
33.32%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–525 · show in text ↑
e3

“the lowest tested ZnO SMPs/NPs concentration (100 mg/l) caused a significant reduction of mycelium growth of F. oxysporum and A. alternata (up to 33.32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO SMPs/NPs at 500 mg/l and higher limited mycelium growth of B. cinerea by up to 82.67%.

Treatment
concentration of 500 mg/l and highere4
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae4pathogen
Outcome
growth of its myceliume4
Direction
limitede4
Value
82.67%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–525 · show in text ↑
e4

“As for B. cinerea , only the concentration of 500 mg/l and higher concentrations of tested material samples limited the growth of its mycelium (up to 82.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vivo, ZnO SMPs did not confirm effectiveness in reducing B. cinerea and A. alternata infection of tomato plants.

Treatment
ZnO SMPse5
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae5pathogen
Second interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae5pathogen
Outcome
infectione5
Direction
reductione5
Setting
In vivoe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In vivo experiment on tomato plants did not confirm the effectiveness of ZnO SMPs in the reduction of B. cinerea and A. alternata infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vivo, ZnO NPs significantly limited the growth of all tested pathogens on tomato by 56.99% to 65.11%, in contrast to ZnO SMPs.

Treatment
ZnO NPse6
Outcome
growth of all pathogense6
Direction
limitede6
Value
56.99% and 65.11%e6
Comparator
ZnO SMPse5
Setting
In vivoe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–525 · show in text ↑
e5

“In vivo experiment on tomato plants did not confirm the effectiveness of ZnO SMPs in the reduction of B. cinerea and A. alternata infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1688 · show in text ↑
e6

“in contrast to ZnO NPs, which significantly limited the growth of all pathogens (by between 56.99% and 65.11%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The advantage of ZnO NPs over ZnO SMPs in inhibiting mycelium growth has not been demonstrated.

Treatment
ZnO NPse7
Outcome
growth of myceliume7
Comparator
ZnO SMPse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to evaluate the impact of those particles on suppressing disease symptoms caused by the three plant pathogens on potted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–525 · show in text ↑
e7

“the advantage of ZnO NPs over ZnO SMPs in inhibiting the growth of mycelium has not been demonstrated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1218 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc oxide · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 28 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

in vitro · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.