Paper · 2025 · HortTechnology

Response of Pumpkin to Over-the-Top Applications of S-Metolachlor

Stephen L. Meyers; Lynn M. Sosnoskie; Kurt M. Vollmer; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Expanding preemergence herbicide registrations to include over-the-top (OTT) applications of S -metolachlor in pumpkins could extend the duration of residual weed control, which would provide the crop with a competitive advantage over weeds. In 2021, field trials were conducted at two locations in Indiana (IN) and a single location each in Delaware (DE), Maryland (MD), Michigan (MI), North Carolina (NC), North Dakota (ND), New Jersey (NJ), New York (NY), Ohio (OH), and Pennsylvania (PA) to evaluate the safety of S -metolachlor OTT in jack-o-lantern varieties across multiple production regions. All locations included treatments consisting of S -metolachlor applied at 1.4 and 2.8 kg·ha −1 at one of two timings (early or late). At some locations, additional treatments included halosulfuron-methyl at 26 g·ha −1 a.i., combined with 0.25% (v/v) nonionic surfactant tank-mixed with S- metolachlor and applied as previously described. With the exception of MI [20 d after planting (DAP)], early applications were made 12 to 15 DAP. Late applications were made between 25 and 31 DAP at all locations. S -metolachlor applied at 1.4 or 2.8 kg·ha −1 caused less than 10% crop injury within a week of application, which declined over time. The highest injury levels were observed with early applications and on loamy sand soils containing ≤2% organic matter. The addition of halosulfuron-methyl significantly increased crop injury to 15% at 1 week after treatment (WAT), with early applications causing more severe damage (25%) than late applications (11%), although pumpkins recovered completely by 6 WAT. Although total and marketable fruit yields were unaffected by herbicide treatments, adding halosulfuron-methyl to OTT application reduced marketable fruit numbers to 84% of the standard control and decreased the proportion of large fruits from 97% to 65%. S -metolachlor applied at 2.8 kg·ha −1 tended to reduce the percentage of commercial-grade fruit and, depending on application timing, increased the proportion of small fruit. Results indicate that applications of S- metolachlor at 1.4 kg·ha −1 a.i. applied 12 to 31 DAP causes minimal crop injury and yield loss and could be a valuable tool for extending residual weed control in pumpkins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor at 1.4 kg per hectare caused less than 10% initial crop injury, which declined.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
S -metolachlor applied at 1.4e0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
declinede0
Value
less than 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“S -metolachlor applied at 1.4 or 2.8 kg·ha −1 caused less than 10% crop injury within a week of application, which declined over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor at 2.8 kg per hectare caused less than 10% initial crop injury, which declined.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
2.8 kg·ha −1e0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
declinede0
Value
less than 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“S -metolachlor applied at 1.4 or 2.8 kg·ha −1 caused less than 10% crop injury within a week of application, which declined over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early applications had the highest injury.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
early applicationse0
Outcome
injury levelse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest injury levels were observed with early applications and on loamy sand soils containing ≤2% organic matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury was highest on loamy sand with at most 2% organic matter.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
early applicationse0
Outcome
injury levelse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
loamy sand soils containing ≤2% organic mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest injury levels were observed with early applications and on loamy sand soils containing ≤2% organic matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halosulfuron-methyl increased crop injury to 15% after one week.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
addition of halosulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of halosulfuron-methyl significantly increased crop injury to 15% at 1 week after treatment (WAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mixed applications caused 25% damage.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
early applicationse0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
more severee0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
late applicationse0

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“early applications causing more severe damage (25%) than late applications (11%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late mixed applications caused 11% damage.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
late applicationse0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
more severee0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
early applicationse0

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“early applications causing more severe damage (25%) than late applications (11%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkins completely recovered by six weeks after treatment.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Outcome
pumpkins recovered completelye0
Value
6 WATe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“although pumpkins recovered completely by 6 WAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total and marketable fruit yields were unaffected by herbicide treatments.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
total and marketable fruit yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“total and marketable fruit yields were unaffected by herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halosulfuron-methyl reduced marketable fruit number to 84% of standard control.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
adding halosulfuron-methyl to OTT applicatione0
Outcome
marketable fruit numberse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
standard controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“adding halosulfuron-methyl to OTT application reduced marketable fruit numbers to 84% of the standard control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halosulfuron-methyl decreased large-fruit proportion from 97% to 65%.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Outcome
proportion of large fruitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
97% to 65%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased the proportion of large fruits from 97% to 65%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor at 2.8 kg per hectare tended to reduce commercial-grade fruit percentage.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
S -metolachlor applied at 2.8 kg·ha −1e0
Outcome
percentage of commercial-grade fruite0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“S -metolachlor applied at 2.8 kg·ha −1 tended to reduce the percentage of commercial-grade fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depending on timing, S-metolachlor at 2.8 kg per hectare increased small-fruit proportion.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
S -metolachlor applied at 2.8 kg·ha −1e0
Outcome
proportion of small fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
depending on application timinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“S -metolachlor applied at 2.8 kg·ha −1 tended to reduce the percentage of commercial-grade fruit and, depending on application timing, increased the proportion of small fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–2037 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1.4 kg per hectare applied 12 to 31 days after planting causes minimal injury and yield loss and may extend residual weed control.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
S- metolachlor at 1.4 kg·ha −1 a.i. applied 12 to 31 DAPe0
Outcome
minimal crop injury and yield losse0

Verbatim

t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“S- metolachlor at 1.4 kg·ha −1 a.i. applied 12 to 31 DAP causes minimal crop injury and yield loss and could be a valuable tool for extending residual weed control in pumpkins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2252 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · crop injury · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · crop injury · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · quality: postharvest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.