Abstract
Response of ‘Dixie’, ‘Lemondrop’, ‘Multipik’, ‘Superpik’, and ‘Seneca Prolific’ summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha, or halosulfuron PRE fb halosulfuron POST at 0.018 fb 0.018, 0.027 fb 0.027, and 0.036 fb 0.036 kg/ha was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998. All halosulfuron treatments and rates reduced the height of cultivars 17–19% at 6 WAP (weeks after planting) and summer-squash injury (chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage) was 6, 14, and 11% from halosulfuron PRE, POST, and PRE fb POST, respectively. Early summer-squash flowering was reduced 32–82% by halosulfuron, resulting in reduced early yields. Dixie was the cultivar most tolerant to halosulfuron. Early flowering of Dixie was reduced 32–36% compared to 32–82% for the other cultivars. Marketable yield of summer squash was reduced 20–30% by all rates of halosulfuron when averaged over all application timings. Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE. Halosulfuron POST or PRE fb POST reduced marketable yield of all summer-squash cultivars by 25–46%. Thus, summer squash was not tolerant of POST halosulfuron; however, Dixie, Multipik, Seneca Prolific, and Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
All halosulfuron treatments and rates reduced the height of summer squash cultivars by 17–19% at 6 weeks after planting.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- halosulfuron treatments and ratese1
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 17–19%e1
- Qualifier
- at 6 WAPe1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“All halosulfuron treatments and rates reduced the height of cultivars 17–19% at 6 WAP (weeks after planting)”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE caused summer squash injury of 6%, with chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 6e1
- Qualifier
- chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliagee1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“summer-squash injury (chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage) was 6, 14, and 11% from halosulfuron PRE, POST, and PRE fb POST, respectively”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron POST caused summer squash injury of 14%, with chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- POSTe1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 14e1
- Qualifier
- chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliagee1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“summer-squash injury (chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage) was 6, 14, and 11% from halosulfuron PRE, POST, and PRE fb POST, respectively”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE fb POST caused summer squash injury of 11%, with chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- PRE fb POSTe1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 11e1
- Qualifier
- chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliagee1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“summer-squash injury (chlorosis and necrosis of crop foliage) was 6, 14, and 11% from halosulfuron PRE, POST, and PRE fb POST, respectively”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron reduced early summer squash flowering by 32–82%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Early summer-squash flowering was reduced 32–82% by halosulfuron, resulting in reduced early yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron reduced early yields of summer squash.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Early summer-squash flowering was reduced 32–82% by halosulfuron, resulting in reduced early yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Dixie was the summer squash cultivar most tolerant to halosulfuron.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Dixie was the cultivar most tolerant to halosulfuron”
Claim · model-written summary
Early flowering of Dixie was reduced 32–36%, compared with 32–82% for the other cultivars.
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Early flowering of Dixie was reduced 32–36% compared to 32–82% for the other cultivars”
e2“Early summer-squash flowering was reduced 32–82% by halosulfuron, resulting in reduced early yields”
Claim · model-written summary
All rates of halosulfuron reduced marketable yield of summer squash by 20–30% when averaged over all application timings.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- all rates of halosulfurone1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 20–30%e1
- Qualifier
- when averaged over all application timingse1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of summer squash was reduced 20–30% by all rates of halosulfuron when averaged over all application timings”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron POST or PRE fb POST reduced marketable yield of all summer squash cultivars by 25–46%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Treatment
- Halosulfuron POST or PRE fb POSTe1
- Outcome
- marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 25–46%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Halosulfuron POST or PRE fb POST reduced marketable yield of all summer-squash cultivars by 25–46%”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE reduced marketable yield of Seneca Prolific by 0–17%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Material
- Seneca Prolifice1
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 0–17%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE reduced marketable yield of Superpik by 0–17%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Material
- Superpike1
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 0–17%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE reduced marketable yield of Dixie by 0–17%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Material
- Dixiee1
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 0–17%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE reduced marketable yield of Multipik by 0–17%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Material
- Multipike1
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 0–17%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Halosulfuron PRE reduced marketable yield of Lemondrop by 0–17%.
- Taxon
- summer squashe0
- Material
- Lemondrope1
- Treatment
- halosulfuron PREe1
- Outcome
- Marketable yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 0–17%e1
- Setting
- fielde2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Marketable yield of Seneca Prolific, Superpik, Dixie, Multipik, and Lemondrop was reduced 0–17% by halosulfuron PRE”
e2“was field evaluated in 1997 and 1998”
Claim · model-written summary
Dixie exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Dixie, Multipik, Seneca Prolific, and Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE”
Claim · model-written summary
Multipik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Dixie, Multipik, Seneca Prolific, and Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE”
Claim · model-written summary
Seneca Prolific exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Dixie, Multipik, Seneca Prolific, and Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE”
Claim · model-written summary
Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“summer squash to halosulfuron PRE or POST at 0.036, 0.053, and 0.072 kg ai/ha”
e1“Dixie, Multipik, Seneca Prolific, and Superpik exhibited tolerance to halosulfuron PRE”
The same questions in other papers
Halosulfuron-methyl · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Halosulfuron-methyl · crop injury · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Halosulfuron-methyl · quality: postharvest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Halosulfuron-methyl · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.